Global warming

Al Gore shows more evidence of global warming. The first picture was taken in 2004, the second in 2009. What was the opinion of the penguins? Well, they found out that it was a lot easier to raise babies at 34 degrees than at 70 below zero.

Where's the Birth Certificate

Obama, who are you and where were you born? Inquiring minds want to know.

The Shuttle's Replacement

That's right, it's back to the Capsule for re-entry. This time the re-entry speed will be greater and landings will be made on land. The reason; I'd say the deciding factor is cost.

Urban Hunter

It's my mouse, I caught it!

Words of wisdom

"I think the reason General Motors is bankrupt is because in all of their years of manufacturing cars, they have never been able to successfully design a cup holder that holds a drink in place when you turn a corner."

"The best way to wean ourselves off of imported oil is to use more of our own, which we have plenty, and not rely on this pie-in-the-sky 'alternative energy' scam. Drill domestically."

"The man who killed the pregnant woman in Puerto Rico should be given five minutes to accept Jesus into his life and then be executed."

Professing themselves to be wise, they became fools

Who's your daddy? Evolution over Creation, I just don't see it. Talking about faith, which is easier to believe? Romans 1:22

Horseshoe Canyon 1279 AD

Geologic changes to the planet happens faster than you think. 1279 AD - 2009 AD

South Dakota Man wins Lotto

The part about the South Dakota man winning is true.

Governments think they own everything

Judge: U.S. Deep-Sea Explorers Must Return Shipwreck Treasure to Spain
Thursday, June 04, 2009

TAMPA, Fla. — A federal judge says deep-sea explorers based in Florida should give 17 tons of shipwreck treasure back to Spain.
Odyssey Marine Exploration said Thursday it will fight a federal magistrate judge's recommendation that the estimated $500 million in silver coins and other 19th century artifacts go to the Spanish government.
Another federal judge will consider the recommendation and decide.
Tampa-based Odyssey has been locked in a court battle with Spain over the ownership of the treasure since announcing the find in May 2007.
Federal magistrate judge Mark Pizzo wrote in an order Wednesday that Spain is the rightful owner of the treasure, which was being carried by a Spanish navy galleon when it sank southwest of Portugal in 1804.

After a tense standoff, the Odyssey Explorer was led to port by a Spanish government vessel.
Back in May, Odyssey Marine Exploration counted the reasons why its latest treasure — an estimated $500 million in silver in a shipwreck — was theirs for the keeping, since the coins recovered “beyond the territorial waters or legal jurisdiction of any country.”
This week, we learned that Spain strongly disagrees. An incensed senior official summed it up to Agence France-Press:
Spanish Culture Minister Antonio Molina said Florida-based Odyssey Marine Exploration was made up of “modern pirates” and he warned that “against pirates, there have always been navies, laws and the state of law.”
“We will pursue them wherever they are. It is a question of national pride and patriotism,” he told reporters, adding the Nasdaq-listed firm “will not escape unharmed for what it has done”.
And those words were preceded with military muscle. On its way out of the Straits of Gibraltar, Odyssey’s Explorer found itself eye-to-eye with a Spanish warship backed by other vessels. The standoff lasted 4 hours before Captain Sterling Vorus agreed to head to port under the “threat of deadly force,” he told Britain’s Telegraph. He was briefly detained.
The episode has left Greg Stemm, Odyssey’s chief executive, expressing confusion with Spain’s intentions. “We’re not sure what the inspection of the Explorer is meant to accomplish,” he said, according to The Tampa Tribune. “We had again invited Spanish officials to inspect the Explorer in advance of our departure and they chose not to take us up on it.”
The coins themselves were brought to “a secure, undisclosed location” before the May announcement and neither side disputes that they are of Spanish origin. Indeed, Odyssey disclosed that fact “when it completed customs forms in Gibraltar on April 10 and May 16,” El Pais reported.
Mr. Stemm refused to respond to reports cited by The Associated Press saying that the captain delayed the search so that “high-tech equipment” could be removed. But two keys to establishing Spain’s claim remain in his grip.
The origin of the shipwreck remains a mystery, the company says, leaving open the possibility that another nation owned the coins. And no one else can investigate further, since Odyssey refuses to reveal anything about the site except that it is “code-named ‘Black Swan’ in an undisclosed location in the Atlantic Ocean.”
And Odyssey is showing no signs of fessing up. Until then, Spanish politicians will be left howling at a secretive American company holding a treasure that has “entered into Spanish lore as the world’s greatest sunken booty.”

Governments don't go after treasures until they have been found by private individuals. Treasure hunters invested the time and money to find treasures and should have the right to keep all of it.

Oh say can you see----forever

One day soon, socialist liberals in America will change the dating system of how we keep time. The plan calls for beginning on Jan. 1, 2012 the date will read 2012 AC. Any date before 2012, like 2004 or 1978 will be 2004 BCE or 1978 BCE. What will cause this historical event? It will be the results of their 50 year effort to rid the world of cars. AC denotes 'After Cars'; BCE is 'Before Cars Eliminated'. Rising gas prices, no drilling, environmental rules, stupid laws and regulations have seceded in the elimination of the automobile. From now on citizens will walk and Government officials will fly to where ever they need to go. The National Anthem, "Oh say can you see----" wording will be change to reflect the new vision for America, an unlimited vision at that.

End of the gas guzzlers

U. S. auto makers answer to Obama's mandate for a car that gets 40 miles per gallon.

Look out, seagull dead ahead

Real life is just not the same as in movies.

Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness

America as the Founding Fathers envision does not exist anymore. It's freedom and greatness has been buried in Socialism. The symbol of America searches again for the "Home of the Brave and the Land of the Free".

Sick Cat

My cat wasn't feeling good so I took her to the vet. The first thing he did was give her a cat scan.

Failure Analysis

Why Congress doesn't work. No matter how many idiots you put in it, you get the same result.

Haters of God cannot stand the Truth

Judge Roy Moore
WND
Are we ashamed?
Posted: May 13, 20091:00 am Eastern© 2009
The Apostle Paul knew well that his open profession of faith in Jesus Christ could cost him his life, yet with boldness he proudly proclaimed, "I am not ashamed of the gospel of Christ: for it is the power of God unto salvation to every one that believeth" (Romans 1:16). Unfortunately, Barack Obama and his administration apparently do not share Paul's courage.
On April 6, while in Turkey, Obama stated at a press conference that "we [American citizens] do not consider ourselves a Christian nation." And Obama has acted in accordance with his views!
Recently, on May 7, our National Day of Prayer, Obama refused to conduct any formal observance of the day. Although he did comply with a statute that requires him to sign a proclamation of a national day of prayer, he discontinued the practice of George W. Bush of inviting Catholics, Protestants and Jews to join at a formal ceremony in Washington, D.C., in recognition of this special day.
Before delivering an address on the economy on April 14 at Georgetown, one of the nation's leading Catholic universities, the White House issued an order that all religious symbols on display where the speech was to be given should be covered. Even the crucifix depiction of our Lord Jesus Christ and the gold letters "IHS" above His head were hidden from view.
"Speechless: Silencing the Christians," by Don Wildmon, lays out determined strategy of coalition of liberal secularists, homosexual activists and Fortune 500 companies
Our forefathers were not ashamed of their Christian faith when they came to America in 1620 in search of religious liberty. Before setting foot on Plymouth Rock, they declared in the Mayflower Compact that they had undertaken their voyage "for ye glorie of God, and advancemente of ye Christian faith."
Nearly every school or university in America was founded on the Christian faith. Harvard was founded 16 years after the Pilgrims landed at Plymouth Rock. According to Harvard's Rules and Precepts in 1642, every student was "plainly instructed, and earnestly pressed to consider well, the maine end of his life and studies is, to know God and Jesus Christ which is eternal life." Yale was founded in 1701 with the primary goal that "every student shall … know God in Jesus Christ." Princeton was founded by evangelical Presbyterians in 1746 to preserve and spread the fervor of the Great Awakening. The nation's first compulsory education law, adopted by Massachusetts in 1647, proclaimed that it was "one chief project of Satan to keep [children] from the knowledge of the scripture" and therefore required that parents ensure that their children learn to read and write. The most common texts in early American schools were the Bible and the Christian "New England Primer."
Unfortunately, many of the young people who attend public schools and universities in America today are being persecuted for their profession of faith in Christ. For example, Renee Griffith, 2008 co-valedictorian at Butte High School in Montana , planned to tell her fellow graduates that during her high school experience she had learned to be a person with a purpose from God with a passionate love for Him. Her co-valedictorian expressed confidence that "the power for change is inherent in humanity and each individual" and that "we all have the framework for greatness and impact." His humanistic faith was acceptable to the authorities, but just before the ceremony, officials ordered Renee to remove the words "Christ" and "God" from her speech and replace them with "sharing my faith" and "lived with a purpose, a purpose derived from my faith and based on a love of mankind." She refused, and she was therefore barred from speaking at her graduation. She sued, and her case is currently before the Montana 13th Judicial District Court.
In Colorado, high school valedictorian Erica Corder mentioned Jesus Christ in her graduation speech, and her principal then ordered her to sign an apology as a condition for receiving her diploma. She sued, and her case is currently before the 10th Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals.
And in a Nevada high school, valedictorian Brittany McComb strayed from her script to say that Jesus had filled a void in her life, and as she said, "God's love is so great that he gave up – gave up his only Son …," her microphone was shut off in mid-sentence. The liberal 9th Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals recently ruled that her free speech and equal protection rights were not violated, and she is appealing to the U.S. Supreme Court.
It is encouraging that so many of our youth are not ashamed of the gospel of Christ. Like our forefathers, they know America is a Christian nation. Even the United States Supreme Court in the Church of the Holy Trinity case in 1892, recognized that a volume of unofficial declarations, "together with a mass of organic utterances," solemnly declare that "this is a Christian nation." It is a shame that our president and some of our other public officials do not share that view.
Like Paul, we must not be ashamed of the gospel of Christ and should recognize and appreciate our Christian heritage. Then, when our battles are over, we can proudly say, as did Paul, "I have fought a good fight, I have finished my course, I have kept the faith!" (2 Timothy 4:7).

Anne of Green Gables

The Anne of Green Gables trilogy is one of the best movies I have ever seen. It's a must see for the entire family if you haven't seen it. It is a three part series including in order 'Anne of Green Gables', 'Anne of Green Gables the Sequel' and 'Anne of Green Gables the continuing Story'. Megan Follows gives an excellent performance as Anne.

Ich liebe Sozialismus

History repeats itself, like Obama's plan for a civilian national security force. I guess they will be modeled like that other one back in history. You know, the Brown Shirts. Most went on to be in the SS.

Me gustan los cerdos

Swine Flu. What, me worry?

The Communist takeover of America

You are about to read a list of 45 goals that found their way down the halls of our great Capitol back in 1963. As you read this, 39 years later, you should be shocked by the events that have played themselves out. I first ran across this list 3 years ago but was unable to attain a copy and it has bothered me ever since. Recently, Jeff Rense posted it on his site and I would like to thank him for doing so. http://www.rense.com

Communist Goals (1963) Congressional Record--Appendix, pp. A34-A35 January 10, 1963

Current Communist Goals EXTENSION OF REMARKS OF HON. A. S. HERLONG, JR. OF FLORIDA IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES Thursday, January 10, 1963 .

Mr. HERLONG. Mr. Speaker, Mrs. Patricia Nordman of De Land, Fla., is an ardent and articulate opponent of communism, and until recently published the De Land Courier, which she dedicated to the purpose of alerting the public to the dangers of communism in America.

At Mrs. Nordman's request, I include in the RECORD, under unanimous consent, the following "Current Communist Goals," which she identifies as an excerpt from "The Naked Communist," by Cleon Skousen:

[From "The Naked Communist," by Cleon Skousen]

1. U.S. acceptance of coexistence as the only alternative to atomic war.

2. U.S. willingness to capitulate in preference to engaging in atomic war.

3. Develop the illusion that total disarmament [by] the United States would be a demonstration of moral strength.

4. Permit free trade between all nations regardless of Communist affiliation and regardless of whether or not items could be used for war.

5. Extension of long-term loans to Russia and Soviet satellites.

6. Provide American aid to all nations regardless of Communist domination.

7. Grant recognition of Red China. Admission of Red China to the U.N.

8. Set up East and West Germany as separate states in spite of Khrushchev's promise in 1955 to settle the German question by free elections under supervision of the U.N.

9. Prolong the conferences to ban atomic tests because the United States has agreed to suspend tests as long as negotiations are in progress.

10. Allow all Soviet satellites individual representation in the U.N.

11. Promote the U.N. as the only hope for mankind. If its charter is rewritten, demand that it be set up as a one-world government with its own independent armed forces. (Some Communist leaders believe the world can be taken over as easily by the U.N. as by Moscow. Sometimes these two centers compete with each other as they are now doing in the Congo.)

12. Resist any attempt to outlaw the Communist Party.

13. Do away with all loyalty oaths.

14. Continue giving Russia access to the U.S. Patent Office.

15. Capture one or both of the political parties in the United States.

16. Use technical decisions of the courts to weaken basic American institutions by claiming their activities violate civil rights.

17. Get control of the schools. Use them as transmission belts for socialism and current Communist propaganda. Soften the curriculum. Get control of teachers' associations. Put the party line in textbooks.

18. Gain control of all student newspapers.

19. Use student riots to foment public protests against programs or organizations which are under Communist attack.

20. Infiltrate the press. Get control of book-review assignments, editorial writing, policy-making positions.

21. Gain control of key positions in radio, TV, and motion pictures.

22. Continue discrediting American culture by degrading all forms of artistic expression. An American Communist cell was told to "eliminate all good sculpture from parks and buildings, substitute shapeless, awkward and meaningless forms."

23. Control art critics and directors of art museums. "Our plan is to promote ugliness, repulsive, meaningless art."

24. Eliminate all laws governing obscenity by calling them "censorship" and a violation of free speech and free press.

25. Break down cultural standards of morality by promoting pornography and obscenity in books, magazines, motion pictures, radio, and TV.

26. Present homosexuality, degeneracy and promiscuity as "normal, natural, healthy."

27. Infiltrate the churches and replace revealed religion with "social" religion. Discredit the Bible and emphasize the need for intellectual maturity, which does not need a "religious crutch."

28. Eliminate prayer or any phase of religious expression in the schools on the ground that it violates the principle of "separation of church and state."

29. Discredit the American Constitution by calling it inadequate, old-fashioned, out of step with modern needs, a hindrance to cooperation between nations on a worldwide basis.

30. Discredit the American Founding Fathers. Present them as selfish aristocrats who had no concern for the "common man."

31. Belittle all forms of American culture and discourage the teaching of American history on the ground that it was only a minor part of the "big picture." Give more emphasis to Russian history since the Communists took over.

32. Support any socialist movement to give centralized control over any part of the culture--education, social agencies, welfare programs, mental health clinics, etc.

33. Eliminate all laws or procedures which interfere with the operation of the Communist apparatus.

34. Eliminate the House Committee on Un-American Activities.

35. Discredit and eventually dismantle the FBI.

36. Infiltrate and gain control of more unions.

37. Infiltrate and gain control of big business.

38. Transfer some of the powers of arrest from the police to social agencies. Treat all behavioral problems as psychiatric disorders which no one but psychiatrists can understand [or treat].

39. Dominate the psychiatric profession and use mental health laws as a means of gaining coercive control over those who oppose Communist goals.

40. Discredit the family as an institution. Encourage promiscuity and easy divorce.

41. Emphasize the need to raise children away from the negative influence of parents. Attribute prejudices, mental blocks and retarding of children to suppressive influence of parents.

42. Create the impression that violence and insurrection are legitimate aspects of the American tradition; that students and special-interest groups should rise up and use ["]united force["] to solve economic, political or social problems.

43. Overthrow all colonial governments before native populations are ready for self-government.

44. Internationalize the Panama Canal.

45. Repeal the Connally reservation so the United States cannot prevent the World Court from seizing jurisdiction [over domestic problems. Give the World Court jurisdiction] over nations and individuals alike.

After the Flood

What kind of world would Noah see after the flood waters receded? Don't you think it's a bit odd that there are virtually NO Public debates between evolution-believing scientists and Creation scientists? And considering the fact that roughly half of all scientists (and 90 % of the public) believe in (either spontaneous or slow) Creation this is even more astounding.
What are evolution-believing scientists and the mass media so afraid of? In other words: IF the theory of evolution is anywhere near as sound as they (want us to) believe, then why not have some publicly televised debates on this issue?
And why are virtually all media "reporters" afraid to give Creationist Scientists ANY of their time? Are they simply afraid that the facts might upset their "faith" (or lack of it), or are they afraid that their liberal bosses and co-workers won't approve of what they might Discover: that is, IF they were to actually report on what they found? And that is a mighty BIG IF isn't it?

Cleopatra

Breaking News > Tech and Science > Story
April 16, 2009
Egypt's search for Cleopatra

AP

Zahi Hawass (above), Egypt's top archaeologist, said the Cleopatra statue and coins - which show an attractive face - debunk a recent theory that the queen was 'quite ugly.' -- PHOTO: AGENCE FRANCE-PRESSE

CAIRO - ARCHAEOLOGISTS will begin excavating sites in Egypt next week in an attempt to solve a mystery that has stymied historians for hundreds of years: Where is the final resting place of doomed lovers Cleopatra and Mark Antony?
Archaeologists looking for the tombs of the celebrated queen of Egypt and the Roman general, who committed suicide in 31 BC, will begin excavating three sites at a temple where tombs may be located, Egypt's Supreme Council of Antiquities said in a statement Wednesday.

Cleopatra and Mark Antony, whose relationship was later immortalised by William Shakespeare and then in a movie with Elizabeth Taylor and Richard Burton, could have been buried in a deep shaft in a temple near the Mediterranean Sea, the council said.

Archaeologists last year unearthed the alabaster head of a Cleopatra statue, 22 coins bearing Cleopatra's image and a mask believed to belong to Mark Antony at the temple.

The three sites were identified last month during a radar survey of the temple of Taposiris Magna, the council's statement said.

Zahi Hawass, Egypt's top archaeologist, said the Cleopatra statue and coins - which show an attractive face - debunk a recent theory that the queen was 'quite ugly.'

'The finds from Taposiris reflect a charm ... and indicate that Cleopatra was in no way unattractive,' said Mr Hawass, according to the statement.

Excavators at the site near Alexandria have already discovered a large previously unknown cemetery outside the temple enclosure.

They have also discovered 27 tombs - including a total of 10 mummies. -- AP

The Enemy of a Socialist America

Above is the final solution for so called Right Wing extremist. How can you tell if you are one?

Are you a Christian and believe in the Bible? You are the enemy.

Do you believe in the Right to bear arms? You are the enemy.

Are you against illegal immigration? You are the enemy.

Do you support ban on same sex marriage? You are the enemy.

Are you against abortion? You are the enemy.

Do you believe homosexuals should not be teaching your children? You are the enemy.

Are you against Socialist brainwashing in our school system? You are the enemy.

Are you a military veteran? You are the enemy because of you military training.

Do you believe in 'Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness' and are against Federal Government control beyond the limits of our Constitution? You are the enemy.

Government offices like the Dept. of Homeland Security, laws like the 'patriot act' and 'hate crimes bill' will be used against Law biding citizens.

Full Throttle

Mud Bogging in Africa is a little different from that in the USA.

Found Ad in Newspaper

I bought it.

Swine Flu

As you can see, Politicians still love to kiss the babies. But now there's a real health risk so keep them away from the political arena, or should I say political pig pen.

Paganism knows no boundry

America plunges ever deeper into pagan rituals. Nothing is out of bounds.

Birds of a feather flock together

Obama is never happier than when he's with his Socialist or Muslims friends. I'm surprised he didn't fall down and kiss the Saudis shoes. Of course anything our Government does is great because Socialism will save the world. If you don't believe me, ask any Democrat. Don't ask a Republican because the Dem's are still training them how to sit, roll over and go fetch.

Welfare Nation

You're Entitled by Harry Browne
Welfare is a good example.
Once upon a time, before the 1960s, a person who needed help got it by appealing to a local charity (such as the Salvation Army) or to the town government. The downtrodden individual had to explain how he got into trouble and how he intended to work his way out of it. He was monitored closely to assure that he was telling the truth and that he stuck to his plan to get back on his feet. And he knew that the money he received came from the pockets of his neighbors. Federal welfare, however, requires nothing more ambitious, energetic, or embarrassing than filling out a form.
In former days, you knew that you had to work for what you got. Today you can get a regular check from the federal government provided you're willing to undertake the arduous task of walking to your mail box once a month.
The same is true for all sorts of government subsidies. You don't have to be broke or hard up. With minimal qualifications, you can just sign up and receive:
Unemployment benefits

Student loans

Farm subsidies

Subsidized mortgages

Subsidized medical insurance

Disaster relief, andThousands of other giveaways.
Once provided, these benefits become "rights," and anyone who suggests eliminating them is denounced as mean and heartless. It's assumed that without farm subsidies all small farmers would go bankrupt and the country would starve; without federal loans no one could afford to go to college; and without Medicare no one would live past 65. No one asks how the country survived so well before these things became government's responsibility.
The worst effect of these programs is to separate acts from consequences. They teach people to be careless. Since you don't have to pay for your own mistakes, you have no reason to exercise caution, restraint, or forethought. Whatever goes wrong, the government will take care of you.
So it should be no surprise that Americans save less than they once did, exercise less caution in their business and personal dealings, seem less able to support themselves, and are more dependent on government to survive. This, of course, provides politicians with an excuse for more laws and subsidies.
America has been transformed from the land of enterprise, initiative, and self-reliance into the land of entitlements and dependency.
Lost Virtues
The transformation has devastated our civilization - bringing on terrifying crime rates, the abandonment of educational standards, an epidemic of teenage pregnancies, and the birth of a permanent class of citizens dependent upon the state for support.
Many of the social problems that worry us so much today were virtually unknown before the federal takeovers of the 1960s:
Crime rates were a fraction of what they are today. Gangs didn't terrorize adults on the street or students in school. No one had seen drive-by shootings since Prohibition ended in 1933.
Children graduated from high school knowing how to read, write, and add - and knowing a great deal about history, geography, and science. Today many college entrants can't even read the entrance exam. And many students have been told little more about Christopher Columbus than that he was an angry white male who took out his frustrations on the Indians.
Teenage pregnancies out of wedlock were virtually unknown. In 1950 only one in 79 unmarried teenage girls gave birth to a baby (even before birth-control pills were available). In 1991 the ratio had dropped to one in 22.
Welfare was rarely discussed, because it wasn't a compelling social issue. "Welfare" as we think of it was a tiny program operated by your city or county government. The truly desperate were helped mostly by private charities who took an interest in seeing that anyone in trouble got out of it as quickly as possible. Today welfare is a national scandal, and few politicians have any idea how to end it.
The escalation of "entitlements" in the 1960s and 1970s has led to the devastation of American cities, the decline of American education, and the deterioration of self-reliance. It has turned America into a battleground on which groups fight for the power to dictate who gets to take what from whom, and who gets to impose the rules dictating how everyone must live.
NO LONGER ANYTHING SPECIAL
The four episodes of rapid government growth destroyed the qualities that had made America unique, and transformed it instead into something like an Old-World nation.
The Civil War changed the federal government into a national government superior to the states and the people.
The Progressive Era established the principle that the government was responsible for the economy, and it produced the foreign policy that has kept us in conflict with one country or another for almost all of the past 80 years.
The New Deal established that no area of American life is off limits to government.
The Great Society destroyed the self-responsibility that made possible the prosperity and freedoms we once took for granted.
A tragic casualty has been the loss of the system of federalism the Founding Fathers designed. That system empowered local governments to set their own rules. Local tyranny existed sometimes, but people could escape it by moving to another state. Today you can escape only by leaving the country.
The four eras transformed America from a free country into a nation of obedient serfs, paper-pushers, victims, whiners, and antagonists. Now we are just another country in which the citizens live at the sufferance of their rulers.
As Joseph Sobran has said, the land of the free has become the land of the government permit.
WHAT'S LEFT?

You are living in it!

U. S. Government vs God

Revelation 21:1. Then I saw a new heaven and a new earth; for the first heaven and the first earth passed away, and there is no longer any sea.

'We must save the planet'. We are brainwashed 24/7 with every thought and deed that is contrary to God. Yes, we need to do everything in our power to protect our planet, but Al Gore and his environmental wackos plan all their deeds in the belief of no God and man himself is left to his own salvation and destiny. They go so far as to say that a green planet without mankind is better than a damaged planet because there might be a species in the future who will do a better job than us. Only Evolution and time will tell.

The second Amendment

The reason I support the right to bear arms, guns to.

Michele Obama still adjusting to living in the White House

There were tense moments at the White House this morning when security personnel rushed to the White House kitchen after hearing Michele Obama yelling and screaming. After several minutes of persuasion the Chief of Security finally convince Michele that these people were the White House Chefs; not a bunch of racist people dressed up in white sheets and cone hats. Can anyone say, 'visions of KKK dancing in her head'.

Don't go Waco on us

Socialize or be criminalized. Conform or be reformed. Give your allegiance to the State. Remember, only your Government can save you. 'Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness' is the slogan of those greedy individuals who are against whats good for society as a whole. We will help everyone to attain a Utopian Society where everyone shares equally. Remember, whatever your problem is, we have a Pill or Thrill to solve it.

Beauty - Evolution or Creative Design

End results of Evolution.

The results through Creation.

By Russell Husted.
Beauty, and the abundance of things beautiful in this world, is surely one of the strongest arguments for God, and against evolution, that one can adduce. And why is that? Because the Bible offers a thorough rationale and explanation for a world filled with beauty, but evolutionary theory offers no rationale or explanation. I've seen several attempts by evolutionists to explain beauty and things beautiful, but they have been very unsuccessful. Here's why.
Since only one relatively unimportant species (humans) can discern or appreciate beauty, beauty is essentially “invisible” to all the other species. That's not a problem for Christian apologists, whose argument is that we are the only ones expected or intended to appreciate and benefit from beauty, but it is a serious problem for evolution apologists. Since beauty is “invisible” - that is, neither perceived nor appreciated as “beauty” - to all other species, it is wholly outside the influence or efficacy of any biotic component of “natural selection”, such as selective predation or mating or symbiosis. Consequently, it confers no reproductive success or advantage, and no survival advantage. Therefore, while the beauty of a living thing may be rooted in its genetics, there is no feedback or influence on its own or any other genome. Therefore, it cannot be explained or justified by evolutionary theory. “Evolution” and “beauty” are pretty much non sequiters.
On the other hand, the Christian arguments - that beauty reflects the nature and the esthetics of God; that it is His personal purpose and will; and that it is a gift from Him to humanity - derive naturally from the Bible and are each reasonable and logically consistent explanations within their theory of creation. In the Biblical paradigm of “intelligent design” by a Designer who loves both beauty and the one species capable of appreciating it, beauty is very much a “sequitur”!Look at the trees. Some trees are tall, some slender, some stately, some precisely geometrically patterned, and some are like mathematical formulae in expression. Like classical music. Others are almost chaotic, following few rules that we can see, but still emerge as something beautiful. Some are wizened and gnarled expressions of survival, but we admire them. We would hate to cut them down even if we were freezing and in need of fuel. I've seen a couple of “ugly” species, to my taste, but usually they're planted in someone's front yard! It's that 90 to 95% agreement thing, again.
Trees, which dominate (or did) almost every landscape and terrain, are beautiful to nearly every human eye. They needn't be, but they are. There's something about them, and about us, that “connects”. It involves colors, textures, designs and symmetries, even their stoic attitudes. There's no reasonable explanation that science can adduce. You have to turn to Scripture and the story of a Creator, Who has a sense of beauty, which He shared with us, if you want any sensible explanation. Not necessarily provable, but as easily argued as any evolutionary rationale, and your choice as to whether it is acceptable.

What about beauty of a different sort?
Why do we almost universally like sunrises and sunsets? Why do we stop to watch the sun go down? Evolution cannot explain it. If anything, I'm sure there is some serious “natural selection” against such appreciation, against such behavior!
Twilight is a dangerous time for prey. Predators are on the prowl, and I can imagine that more than one human has paid the price for dallying, its attention focused on a red sky or red cliffs, while the lion stalked. Sitting out under the stars, dreamily contemplating the dark and sparkling heavens, or gazing at salmon pink clouds, or lightening on the horizon, instead of seeking shelter and safety, sorely dares “natural selection” to permit our evolution as creatures with a sense for beauty.
The creation account, however, of Genesis 1 & 2 clearly tells us that this world was created for our pleasure. It tells us, as my more precise translation reveals, that it was fashioned and designed with love and intention. Many other scriptures tell us that the natural creation purposely and thoroughly reflects God's nature, and tastes, and purposes. The Bible tells us, several times, that if we want to know Him and discern His nature, we only need look closely at His creation. Romans 1:19,20 says it very plainly, and forcefully:
“because what may be known of God is manifest in them, for God has shown it to them.
“For since the creation of the world His invisible attributes are clearly seen, being understood by the things that are made, even His eternal power and Godhead…”
That, within the context of the creation account and many other scriptures, is a powerful explanation of beauty. You don't have to believe it, of course. It's totally your choice. You have complete freedom to believe or not believe in God, in a Creator, an intelligent designer, or in chance. But if you choose to believe in chance as the designer of the life that inhabits this planet, and look to evolutionary theory and rationale to account for the abundant wealth of beauty present on this planet, you'll be sorely disappointed. It will be a fruitless exercise, both scientifically and intellectually.

Stairway to Heaven

U. S. Government officials to the Left. American citizens to the Right.

Government attack on Christianity

How have our spiritual ancestors suffered?
Another beast…ordered the people of the world to make a great statue of the first beast, who was fatally wounded and then came back to life. He was permitted to give life to this statue so that it could speak. Then the statue commanded that anyone refusing to worship it must die.
Revelation 13:11, 14-15 NLT
The Great Persecution
When Diocletian became emperor of the Roman Empire in 284, Christians were encouraged because of rumors that his wife and daughter were believers. And, in fact, during the first nineteen years of his reign, Christians lived in relative peace and prosperity.
Gradually, life became more difficult for Christians. Deciding that religious unity would strengthen his empire, Diocletian published three edicts to guarantee the supremacy of the Roman state religion.
On February 23, 303, the day of the Roman feat Terminalia, an edict was posted that ordered all copies of Scripture to be burned, all churches destroyed, their property confiscated, and Christian worship forbidden. The Great Persecution had begun.
In early 304 another edict insisted that everyone in the Roman Empire sacrifice to the Roman gods. Every Christian was in jeopardy. Finally, the years of the Great Persecution ended with an edict of toleration by Constantine in 313. It granted religion liberty to Christians and pagans alike.
"…we decree still further in regard to the Christians, that their places, in which they were formerly accustomed to assemble…shall be restored to the said Christians, without demanding money or any other equivalent, with no delay or hesitation… For by this means… the divine favor toward us which we have already experienced in many matters will continue sure through all time."

How soon will it be before this type of story is today's headline in America's newspapers?

Matthew 18:6

The greatest judgement against America will be the harm we have done to our children. Child abuse, whether physically, spirituality and mentally. In lawyers term, this technicality will convict most Americans to damnation in the eyes of God. The primary responsibility is with the parents, but the Judges, Government officials, the media and ACLU type groups will be held equally responsible for their attempt to ban Christianity from being taught or mention anywhere in America's society. Eliminating Prayer in school, promoting Evolution and banning of the Ten Commandments; just three examples. Today's TV shows and Video games are an abomination to God and all that is good.

Socialist Government is "The Great Satan"

PATRICE LEWIS
WND
What is a socialist?
Posted: March 07, 20091:00 am Eastern© 2009
The one fascinating thing I'm learning in writing for WND is the staggering ability of so many people to deny reality.
In last week's column, I pointed out that a lot of out-of-control brats in Washington are spending money and grabbing liberties. But from the e-mails I received from readers, it's clear the "progressives" don't get it. My opinion is this: Whether you call it a mallard or a canvasback or a teal, it's still a duck.
According to Dictionary.com, socialism is "Any of various theories or systems of social organization in which the means of producing and distributing goods is owned collectively or by a centralized government that often plans and controls the economy."
Socialism might sound lofty and enlightened to liberals, but those of us in Flyover Country know better. If you take anything decent, traditional and uplifting – and flip it on its head – you have socialism. To whit:

1. Socialists believe in the use of force to gain their personal ends. Whether it's light bulbs or alternative energy or public schools or national health care, in the end there's always a gun at your head to get you to conform. If a man holds you up in the street, does it matter if he wants the money for drugs or to bail out someone's mortgage? It's still a gun, and it's still armed robbery.
2. Socialists believe in slavery. Their concept is not the slavery of an individual owning another individual, but of a state owning the output of the individual. We are now forced to work four months out of the year for the federal government before we see a dime of our own income, and it's getting worse. Our new administration has just indebted every family an additional $11,000 without our permission or approval. This is economic slavery. (If you don't believe me, watch what happens if you don't pay your taxes. See No. 1 above.)
3. Socialists are racists. The content of the character doesn't matter; it's all about the color of the skin. Read the e-mail I received in response to last week's column, in which the writer somehow made the extraordinary leap in logic from my premise of government fiscal irresponsibility to William Byrd whipping slaves three centuries ago. Yes, Byrd was a nasty man. But what on earth did that have to do with the topic of my column? This illustrates that socialists will always bring up the subject of race, regardless of the prevailing drift of the conversation.
Most people tend to look at the content of peoples' character rather than the color of their skin. If someone is honest, hardworking and decent, then who cares what he looks like? But if they're angry, abusive and violent … then sorry, the content of their character is demonstrating that they're not people to associate with, regardless of skin color. Conservatives – true conservatives – really don't give a diddly darn about someone's melanin content. As columnist Burt Prelutsky put it, "… most white Americans don't spend a lot of time dwelling on anyone's race. They're much too busy trying to make a living and raise their kids."
Socialists believe the worst in everyone. They believe that we are all racists, therefore racism must be shoved in our faces constantly. They believe we are stingy, so we must have our money forcibly removed and redistributed to others. They believe we are heartless and that the only source of compassion is the government, so compassion becomes government-mandated.
4. Socialists think religion, especially Christianity, is stupid and nothing but a prop for the unwashed masses. Why else would they forbid expressions of faith anywhere except (grudgingly) within the walls of a church? Religious people are seen as uneducated, primitive, bitterly-clinging troglodytes. Socialism is Satan's plan for Man, not God's.
5. Socialists believe in an ignorant society. How else can we explain their slavish devotion to a public school system that is so dumbed down that students can't read their own diplomas? Socialists know an ignorant society is good. Useful idiots are more amenable to dominance than citizens who have read and understood the documents of the Founding Fathers.
6. Socialists believe you have no right of self-defense. They don't even want you to talk about it in a school assignment. They pretend to have utter faith that government agents can protect you from any and all harm. In reality, it's the government agents that are among our biggest threats. What socialists are really concerned about is your ability to defend yourself against them.
7. Socialists are intolerant. If you have a dissenting opinion, you are mocked and ridiculed for having the temerity to disagree. Socialists do not believe in freedom of speech or they wouldn't be concerned about Rush Limbaugh or what ministers say from the pulpit.
8. Socialists are hypocrites. They expect the unwashed masses to conform to their ideals while they, the lofty and elite, are exempt. How else can you explain Al Gore's energy-sucking mansion? How else can they claim conservative talk radio or Internet news is too powerful when socialists dominate the newspaper and television media?
9. Above all, socialists are in denial. No matter how much you point out the obvious – that the government is fulfilling the dictionary definition of socialism – they flat deny it. If you point out the horrors of socialized medicine, for example, a socialist will say "But this time it will be different." Socialists are unconcerned that the government holds 40 percent of Citibank and over 80 percent of AIG. Nancy Pelosi assures us that government takeovers of banks should be "transitional" but not permanent, and Steny Hoyer hesitates "to use the word nationalization." You'll notice they don't deny it's a government takeover. They merely refuse to call a duck a duck. Quack quack.
Citizens do NOT have to politely accept liberal mandates as just another viewpoint in the American experience. Socialists are the enemy of the Constitution, and their ideas are antithetical to life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness.

New World Order, no place for Israel

Who kills more Israeli's, Islam or American foreign policies?

Is it time for revolt?
Posted: WND March 05, 20091:00 am Eastern© 2009
There comes a point when free men and women must say no to oppressive government exceeding its authority.
I think most everyone would agree with that.
Our Founding Fathers said no to the misuse of authority by the British crown, and most Americans believe it was the right thing to do. In fact, we are Americans today because of the courageous stand they took for liberty and justice.
I believe American government is entering an advanced stage of institutional injustice, corruption, oppression and tyranny that warrants protest, at the very least, and perhaps even defiance if we are to hold on to the ideals of the Declaration of Independence and the Constitution.
The government is creating massive debts that can never be repaid.
The government is encouraging the worst kind of irresponsible personal lifestyles – from endless consumption without regard to the consequences to expecting bailouts from taxpayers to killing inconvenient, unwanted children in utero to unhealthy and unnatural behavior.
The government is grabbing powers for which it has no authority under the Constitution.
The government is making fatefully bad decisions about national security and national defense.
I could go on and on with such a list. But rather than talk about the macro-disasters being hatched in Washington on a daily basis by Barack Obama and the Democratic Congress, I would like to examine just one tiny example of the way they not only squander your wealth, but actually commit it to causes of pure, unadulterated evil.
A couple years ago, the U.S. government pressured Israel to evacuate all Jews from the Gaza Strip. Why? Because the Arab Muslims in Gaza insisted no Jews could live among them. Period. End of story. They demanded ethnic cleansing, and the world, for the most part, agreed.
So Israel capitulated, while acknowledging it fully expected the decision to result in an increase in terrorist violence directed at Jews inside Israel. That's exactly what happened.
Israel didn't respond forcefully to the attacks, again because of pressure from the U.S. and the rest of the world. Finally, after the attacks continued to intensify and spill more Jewish blood, Israel used its superior military forces to stop the attacks – with a minimum of human carnage, I might add.
Now what do you suppose the U.S. government wants to do?
It is offering to spend nearly $1 billion more in U.S. taxpayer wealth to build up ethnically cleansed Gaza, once again, though Washington claims it will not allow the ruling authorities in Gaza – the terrorist group Hamas – to control how the money is spent. Of course, that would be like transferring wealth to Iran with the understanding the mullahs will not control how it is used. It doesn't work that way. Like it or not, Hamas thugs control Gaza. They won the privilege to do that in elections, no less.
Now think about this.
Where else in the world does the U.S. government subsidize communities that practice ethnic cleansing?
Where else in the world does the U.S. support the notion that Jews, or some other religious or ethnic minority, don't have the right to live in peace?
Where else in the world does the U.S. government dole out money to an area under 100 percent control by Jew-hating, Christian-hating, America-hating terrorists?
The answer, of course, is only in the Middle East – and only when immoral people like Hillary Clinton and Barack Obama are involved.
It's very dangerous to advocate this position. It's very risky. But someone has to stand up and start talking about it.
Is it time for people of the light to start denying the U.S. government the money to practice this kind of evil?
I know it's past time for us to be out in the streets protesting against all this new regime is doing to undermine the Constitution, America's heritage of freedom and the basic tenets of Western Civilization.
Maybe it's also time to say we just won't be a part of funding the hate.

Charles Darwin was right

One day the Liberal will evolve into the creature that truly matches their IQ and actions. They will have finally reached their goal and will be able to live comfortably in their bodies.

Dick Durban advances Socialism using Race Card

Conservatives ask: Is Durbin going after Limbaugh?
By Alexander Bolton
Posted: 02/26/09 04:58 PM [ET]
Conservatives fear that Democrats are pursuing a “back door” approach to cracking down on Clear Channel Communications, the media conglomerate that airs "The Rush Limbaugh Show," a favorite among conservatives.

The Senate voted along party lines Thursday to adopt an amendment sponsored by Sen. Dick Durbin (Ill.), the second-ranking Democrat in the chamber, that directs the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) to “promote diversity in communication media ownership and to ensure that broadcast station licenses are used in the public interest.”
The measure passed 57-41 without a single Republican vote.Durbin said his proposal would encourage more women and minorities to apply for radio and TV ownership. But Sen. Jim DeMint (S.C.), chairman of the conservative Senate Republican Steering Committee, charged the proposal would lead to regulatory pressure on Clear Channel, which owns and operates more than 1,200 radio stations in the United States. The vote came minutes before the Senate voted overwhelmingly to quash the Fairness Doctrine, a regulation the FCC enforced until the mid-1980s that required radio and TV stations to give equal airtime to conservative and liberal viewpoints. Democrats have tried several times to revive the Fairness Doctrine, which critics argue would decimate conservative talk radio. Those efforts failed because of vetoes by former Presidents Ronald Reagan and George H.W. Bush.President Obama has made clear that he does not intend to reinstate the doctrine.But Republicans aren’t convinced that Democrats have given up on loosening conservatives' grip on talk radio.

“Sen. Durbin’s amendment exposed Democrat intentions to impose radio censorship through the back door using vague regulations dealing with media ownership,” said DeMint. Sen. John Thune (S.D.), vice chairman of the Senate Republican Conference, said, “I am troubled that as we killed the ‘Fairness Doctrine,’ Sen. Durbin’s amendment brought to life a new threat to talk radio and other arenas of free speech.”Aides to DeMint said the proposal was an attempt to “muzzle successful syndicated radio program” such as Limbaugh's. “They’re trying to break up Clear Channel and other successful syndicated radio programs,” said Wesley Denton, a spokesman for DeMint. Durbin dismissed the charge.“To argue what I am putting here is a dramatic change in the law, is going to somehow muzzle Rush Limbaugh — that’s not the case,” said Durbin during a floor debate with DeMint.“No one is suggesting that the law for the Federal Communications Commission [FCC] says that you can give this license to a Republican and this one to a Democrat and this one to a liberal and this one to a conservative.“When we talk about diversity in media ownership, it relates primarily to gender, race and other characteristics of that nature,” Durbin said.

The Senate voted to append Durbin’s proposal to the District of Columbia Voting Rights Act, which passed the Senate on Thursday afternoon. Minutes after adopting Durbin’s amendment, the Senate voted 87-11 to adopt an amendment sponsored by DeMint that would prevent the FCC from reinstating the Fairness Doctrine. Republicans have introduced companion legislation in the House, but Democrats in that chamber are not expected to allow a vote on the bill. Conservatives fear that forcing stations to make equal time for liberal talk radio would slash profits and pressure radio executives to scale back on conservative programming to avoid escalating costs and interference from government regulators.

Opponents of the Fairness Doctrine argue that liberal talk radio has not proven popular or profitable. For example, Air America, liberals’ answer to “The Rush Limbaugh Show,” filed for bankruptcy in October 2006.The FCC discarded the policy in 1985 after deciding that it restricted journalistic freedom and “actually inhibit[ed] the presentation of controversial issues of public importance, to the detriment of the public and in degradation of the editorial prerogative of broadcast journalists,” according to a Congressional Research Service report.

I guess the Democrats think women and blacks won't do anything unless the government helps them. I think they use race and gender to advance all their Socialist causes because they think people won't see through their deceit. The trouble is that it works especially with our dumb down society.

Talk Radio safe now

The 'Fairness Doctrine' today was voted down in Congress, including most Democrats voting against it. So now you think that Talk Radio will be safe for people like Savage, Rush and Beck. Well, not so fast. The Democrats in Congress knew that passing this bill to control free speech would go bad for them in the eyes of the public so they will let the courts do their dirty work for them. Just wait and see if now the courts get involved under the pretense of hateful or damaging speech against the well being of society. People seem to accept the loss of their rights and freedoms if it's made into law. The Socialist control the Television, Newspapers and partial control of who's books get printed. Just two more outlets to go for total control. That is Talk Radio and the Internet. Once it was book burning, now it requires control of all the various forms of media delivery.

Hamas and Carter, Thank you Hillary

U.S. plans $900 million pledge for Gaza
Mon Feb 23, 2009 7:26pm GMT
"UK PALESTINIANS CLINTON FUNDS "U.S. plans $900 million pledge for Gaza" WASHINGTON (Reuters) - The United States plans to pledge more than $900 million (621 million pounds) to help rebuild Gaza after Israel's invasion and strengthen the Western-backed Palestinian Authority, a U.S. official said on Monday.
The money will be channelled through U.N. and other bodies and will not be distributed via the militant group Hamas, which rules Gaza, said the official, who spoke on condition of anonymity as U.S. Secretary of State Hillary Clinton plans to make the announcement next week at a Gaza donors conference in Egypt.
(Reporting by Sue Pleming)

Billions of dollars over the years but never for weapons, yeah Right!

Women's status in Islamic world

Was New York wife alive during beheading?TV mogul accused of stabbing, decapitation won't face 1st degree murder
Posted: February 23, 200910:10 pm Eastern
By Chelsea Schilling© 2009 WorldNetDaily
Aasiya and Muzzammil Hassan
Police revealed the decapitated wife of a Muslim TV network founder in New York was stabbed several times with hunting knives and may have been alive as her killer beheaded her – and, despite the brutal slaying, her husband will only face charges of second-degree murder.
As WND previously reported, Muzzammil Hassan, 44, who has been charged with beheading his wife, Aasiya Hassan, 37, was the recipient of an award from the controversial Council on American-Islamic Relations, the self-described Muslim civil rights group that boasts of its influence on U.S. government policy.
The Hassans founded Bridges TV in November 2004. They described it as a satellite news and opinion channel aimed at portraying Muslims in a positive light following the Sept. 11 attacks.
Hassan is accused of cutting off his wife's head at his Buffalo, N.Y., station Feb. 12. However, sources have now confirmed that the woman was gouged with hunting knives before she was decapitated, the Buffalo News reports.
Orchard Park police said Hassan is not a hunter, and would not say how he may have obtained the knives. Authorities have refused to discuss details of the case, and are still investigating to determine whether Aasiya was alive while her murderer decapitated her.
The victim's lawyer said Aasiya, a Pakistani national, filed for divorce after numerous incidents of domestic violence. She cited "cruel and inhuman treatment" as reason for the dissolution.
Aasiya had a restraining order against her husband as of Feb. 6 and had kicked him out of their home in Orchard Park, a Buffalo suburb. Her older sister, Asma Firfirey, told the Cape Argus in South Africa that Aasiya often called to talk about marital troubles and said she believes her sister suffered several hours of torture before being murdered.
On Feb. 12, Hassan informed police his wife was dead and told them exactly where to find her remains. Authorities located the woman's head lying next to her body in a studio hallway.
Muzzammil Hassan receives award from CAIR-PA Chairman Iftekhar Hussain and CAIR National Chairman Parvez Ahmed.
Some have described the murder as an "honor killing" – a term used to describe a killing in which a Muslim man murders his daughter or wife to defend the family's honor. In countries where Islam is practiced, the murders may be perceived as excusable or understandable punishment for a woman's disobedience.
While CNN reports Hassan admitted to killing Aasiya, Hassan's defense attorney, James P. Harrington, claims his client never confessed to the murder.
An Erie County grand jury is expected to hear Hassan's case soon. If convicted of second-degree murder, Hassan may face life in prison. According to New York State law, the charge is applied in cases where an attacker "acted under the influence of extreme emotional disturbance for which there was a reasonable explanation or excuse."
A first-degree murder conviction could have meant a maximum sentence of life without parole, but prosecutors say the charge may only be applied to 13 specific deliberate types of homicides, including murders of judges, law enforcement officers, witnesses, or in cases of torture, contract, terrorist or serial killings.
According to New York Penal Law Section 125.27, a person is guilty of murder in the first degree when he causes the death of a person and "acted in an especially cruel and wanton manner pursuant to a course of conduct intended to inflict and inflicting torture upon the victim prior to the victim's death."
Despite the gruesome nature of the attack, stab wounds and decapitation, and the law's torture clause, prosecutors told the Buffalo News they cannot charge Hassan with first-degree murder because the crime doesn't fit New York State requirements.

Benjamin Netanyahu

Benjamin Netanyahu as Israel's new Prime Minister in closed meeting with Pres. Obama requested permission to launch air strikes against specific targets in Plains, Georgia. He said they have credible evidence that one of the major players of the Hamas terrorist group lives there.

Very little news coverage of beheading in America

Orchard Park, New York police are investigating a particularly gruesome killing, the beheading of a woman, after her husband — an influential member of the local Muslim community — reported her death to police Thursday.
Police identified the victim as Aasiya Z. Hassan, 37. Detectives have charged her husband, Muzzammil Hassan, 44, with second-degree murder.
"He came to the police station at 6:20 p.m. [Thursday] and told us that she was dead," Orchard Park Police Chief Andrew Benz said late this morning.
Muzzammil Hassan told police that his wife was at his business, Bridges TV, on Thorn Avenue in the village. Officers went to that location and discovered her body.
Muzzammil Hassan is the founder and chief executive officer of Bridges TV, which he launched in 2004, amid hopes that it would help portray Muslims in a more positive light.
The killing apparently occurred some time late Thursday afternoon. Detectives still are looking for the murder weapon.
"Obviously, this is the worst form of domestic violence possible," Erie County District Attorney Frank A. Sedita III said today.
Authorities say Aasiya Hassan recently had filed for divorce from her husband.
"She had an order of protection that had him out of the home as of Friday the 6th [of February]," Benz said.
Muzzammil Hassan was arraigned before Village Justice Deborah Chimes and sent to the Erie County Holding Center.

Ironically, Bridges TV was launched by Hassan in 2004 in Buffalo, New York, in an effort to portray Muslims in a more positive light. Erie Country District Attorney has called this the “worst form of domestic violence possible.” Because honor killings, such as beheadings, are still fairly uncommon in the United States, it is curious that the mainstream media has failed to adequately cover this story. MSNBC is the only major media to mention this story. MSNBC ran a scant report that only summarized The Buffalo News report.

After all, we are not Denmark. It's about Muslims and our Socialist state controlled media would only deem it important if Christians or Jews had done it. Their policy is not to portray Islam in a bad light.

Bigger is better

The 'O' will solve America's problems by adding an 'O'

Government says Homeless not paying their fair share

The new Liberal Socialist Democrat administration along with the outgoing 'spend like there's no tomorrow' Compassionate Conservative Party has created a new entrepreneur in America. Although very sucessful, the Government is looking for a way to tax this new class of people.

Michael Savage The Enemy Within

PRESIDENT'S DAY VS. LINCOLN'S BIRTHDAY

TODAY AMERICA CELEBRATES A PATHETIC SHADOW OF A HOLIDAY CALLED PRESIDENT'S DAY. WHAT ONCE WAS ABRAHAM LINCOLN'S BIRTHDAY AND GEORGE WASHINGTON'S BIRTHDAY HAVE BEEN COMBINED INTO ONE BLAND AND AMBIGUOUS ACKNOWLEDGEMENT OF OUR PRESIDENTS. IT IS NO LONGER POLITICALLY CORRECT TO HAVE A HOLIDAY NAMED FOR A WHITE, AMERICAN MAN. IT IS NO LONGER ACCEPTABLE TO MENTION A PRESIDENT WHO LED OUR NATION DURING A TIME OF WAR. IT IS NO LONGER APPROPRIATE TO SPEAK THE NAME OF SOMEONE KNOWN TO AS THE FATHER OF OUR COUNTRY. THAT WOULD BE TOO CHAUVINISTIC. THAT WOULD BE TO MISOGYNISTIC. THAT WOULD BE TOO INSENSITIVE.

GEORGE WASHINGTON DEFEATED THE GREATEST MILITARY POWER ON THE FACE OF THE EARTH THAT EXISTED IN HIS DAY. BUT WE ARE NOT ALLOWED TO IDENTIFY HIM. ABRAHAM LINCOLN ISSUED THE EMANCIPATION PROCLAMATION WHICH FREED THE SLAVES AND YET HIS NAME IS ENSLAVED IN OBSCURITY. GEORGE WASHINGTON GUIDED THE CREATION OF THE CONSTITUTION OF THE UNITED STATES, THE SAME CONSTITUTION WHICH GUARANTEES US FREE SPEECH, AND YET WE CANNOT SPEAK HIS NAME IN CELEBRATION OF HIS BIRTHDAY. ABRAHAM LINCOLN LED THE COUNTRY IN THE MIDST OF A CIVIL WAR. BUT TODAY WE ARE AT A POINT WHERE BECAUSE OF HIS RACE AND SEX, ABRAHAM LINCOLN IS EXCLUDED FROM PUBLIC MENTION, EXCEPT WHEN HE'S COMPARED TO OBAMA.

IN THIS IS A DAY AND AGE, A SINGLE RACE IS GIVEN ITS OWN EXCLUSIVE HOLIDAY IN THE FORM OF MARTIN LUTHER KING DAY. BUT THE PEOPLE WHO CREATED THIS COUNTRY AND PEOPLE, WHO PRESERVED THIS COUNTRY IN ITS DARKEST MOMENTS, AND THE PEOPLE WHO CONTINUE TO BUILD IT TODAY RECEIVE NO RECOGNITION BECAUSE IT OFFENDS THE SENSITIVITIES OF AN ELITE MINORITY. ABOLISH PRESIDENTS' DAY. BRING BACK GEORGE WASHINGTON'S BIRTHDAY AND LINCOLN'S BIRTHDAY. SPEAK THE NAMES OF THE GREAT MEN WHO FOUNDED AND BUILT THIS NATION. AND SHOUT DOWN THE SANCTIMONIOUS SIMPERING OF THE LIBERALS THAT ECHOES FORTH OUT OF EVERY TELEVISION SCREEN IN THIS COUNTRY.

Arab Israeli Peace Plan

JERUSALEM (AP) - Tzipi Livni, who hopes to be appointed Israel's prime minister-designate, said Monday Israel must give up considerable territory in exchange for peace with the Palestinians, drawing a clear distinction with her rival, Benjamin Netanyahu.
She told a convention of American Jewish leaders, "we need to give up parts of the Land of Israel," using a term that refers to biblical borders that include today's Israel, the West Bank and Gaza, repeating her well-known view that pulling out of Palestinian areas would be for the good of Israel, to maintain it as a Jewish state.
Livni told the Conference of Presidents of Major American Organizations that Israel must take the initiative and come forward with its own peace plan to head off international programs. "Any plan put on the table will not be in our interest," she said.
Livni's centrist Kadima Party won one more seat than the hawkish Likud, led by Netanyahu. He opposes large-scale territorial concessions in peace talks with the Palestinians. He believes negotiations should concentrate instead on building up the Palestinian economy.

Idea came from Dubai's off shore island building. Finally an Arab plan that drives Israel into the sea and a Israeli politician who would probably support it.