Take back America

Take back America
Take back America

None dare call it treason

None dare call it treason

Monday, September 29, 2008

Replacing God with Government


Ask a LSD party person (liberal socialist democrat) what made America great and he or she will say Government. Ask a true conservative and he or she will say God thru our faith in Jesus Christ. Foreign non-Christians nations did not have a problem with America's belief in God in the past. But when a Nation loses it's moral compass, it loses the respect of others and the enemy senses weakness and moves in to destroy that Nation.

Sunday, September 28, 2008

The whole story you won't hear from our politicians

Soviet-style collapse in America's future?
Posted: By Henry Lamb


The meltdown in the financial markets has caused the finger of blame to spin like a weather vane in a hurricane. The underlying cause of the debacle, however, has been largely ignored. Driven by "progressive" Democrats and Republicans, the cause is the relentless shift from a free market economy to a socialist economy.
Until the Roosevelt era, the responsibility and privilege of having a home was left solely to the individual. Few people realize that Fannie Mae (Federal National Mortgage Association) was created in 1938 by FDR, to provide a federal guarantee for home loans extended by local banks.
Freddie Mac (Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corporation) was created in 1970, during Nixon's reign. Both were designed to buy mortgages from local lenders as a way to insure an adequate supply of money for local lenders. These "secondary" mortgages were packaged into "bundles" of securities that were traded among an array of financial institutions.
During the 1960s, the United Nations produced the International Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Racial Discrimination. Article V(e)(iii) proclaimed that all people had a "right" to housing. Both the Kennedy and Johnson administrations supported the treaty, but it was not ratified until the Clinton administration, Nov. 20, 1994. No one noticed or connected the dots to the emerging socialist, communitarian concept called "sustainable development." Grass-roots organizations across the nation were deeply involved in preventing ratification of another U.N. treaty, the Convention on Biological Diversity, which was also under consideration at the time.
To meet its obligations under the U.N.'s Racial Discrimination Treaty, the Clinton administration instructed Fannie Mae to expand loans to low-income borrowers, according to Franklin D. Raines, Fannie Mae's chairman. Thus, the "sub-prime" market was born, and government guaranteed-loans were extended to millions of families who could not qualify for a mortgage in a free market economy, but easily qualified under the new socialist scheme.
In 2005, Republican senators saw the danger and tried to reform these institutions with the Federal Housing Enterprise Regulator Reform Act (S.190), but Democrats blocked the bill.
Both Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac were institutions that were neither purely socialist, nor purely free market – a blend that is best described as communitarian, in that they allowed private investors to buy and hold shares in the corporations, but were also guaranteed by the federal government. That is, until recently, when the federal government took over both institutions. Now, the federal government essentially owns all those properties – a result that is as socialist as had the government nationalized those properties by force.
AIG, the international insurance giant, and other Wall Street and international financial institutions bought the bundles of mortgage securities that Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac offered. Everybody involved made a ton of money, and housing for low-income families expanded exponentially – just as the Treaty on Racial Discrimination and the proponents of sustainable development had predicted. With all the new loans being made, the home building industry flourished, the real estate industry flourished, all industries related to housing flourished – until the market became saturated.
Home values stopped rising. Housing inventories began to rise. Home values began to decline. Foreclosures began to rise. Home building slowed, housing-related industries began to lay off workers. Energy prices began to rise. Paychecks fell short of family needs. Foreclosures skyrocketed. Suddenly, there was little or no value in the bundles of security Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac had packaged. Financial institutions found themselves in possession of massive "assets" that had no value. Creak, crumble, crash! The financial markets came tumbling down.
The piper must be paid. The question is whether to do it now – and let the chips fall where they may, or, to kick the can down the road and pay the piper later. The answer, of course, is to kick the can into the next generation, with another leap toward socialism. The bailout plan – whatever the particulars – is nothing short of a government takeover of the financial industry. The next president will have to sort it out and build the road toward future recovery or final disaster.
Barack Obama's incessant drumbeat about the failure of the economic policies of the last eight years is either gross ignorance or, more likely, political blame shifting. The cause of the current meltdown is clearly the Democrat's insistence upon giving federally guaranteed mortgages to people who could not afford them. Even now, Democrats insist, not on the minimum government involvement possible, but on adding all sorts of give-away ornaments on the bailout Christmas tree. Obama is also promising to take over the energy industry, the health industry, and to give tax credits and even refunds to some people with money he shamelessly takes from others. This is redistribution of wealth – pure socialism.
McCain may be only marginally better, but any deterrent to the Democrats' determined transformation of America to unabashed socialism should be welcomed. Despite the U.N.'s declaration to the contrary, no person has a "right" to housing. If Democrats prevail and continue their pursuit of the U.N'.s goal of universal socialism, America can expect to experience the same total collapse experienced by the Soviet Union.
Ultimately, the piper must be paid.


48% of Americans vote Democrat. 48% of Americans vote Republican. At least this is what we are told by our media. These figures have been pretty much the same for the last 45 years but the American people are told that our troubles are the fault of the other party. So as of 2008 only 4% of the American people have figured out that our two party government keeps Americans on a prescribed course to a New World U. N. controlled Socialist order. Globalism where the masses are controlled like sheep. People who owe their existence, life and well being to a government. As mention in previous post, a Fahrenheit 451 society.

Thursday, September 25, 2008

Ron Paul knew this day was coming years ago but no one would listen.


Message from Ron Paul to the Nation:
Dear Friends,
Whenever a Great Bipartisan Consensus is announced, and a compliant media assures everyone that the wondrous actions of our wise leaders are being taken for our own good, you can know with absolute certainty that disaster is about to strike.
The events of the past week are no exception.
The bailout package that is about to be rammed down Congress’ throat is not just economically foolish. It is downright sinister. It makes a mockery of our Constitution, which our leaders should never again bother pretending is still in effect. It promises the American people a never-ending nightmare of ever-greater debt liabilities they will have to shoulder. Two weeks ago, financial analyst Jim Rogers said the bailout of Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac made America more communist than China! “This is welfare for the rich,” he said. “This is socialism for the rich. It’s bailing out the financiers, the banks, the Wall Streeters.”
That describes the current bailout package to a T. And we’re being told it’s unavoidable.
The claim that the market caused all this is so staggeringly foolish that only politicians and the media could pretend to believe it. But that has become the conventional wisdom, with the desired result that those responsible for the credit bubble and its predictable consequences - predictable, that is, to those who understand sound, Austrian economics - are being let off the hook. The Federal Reserve System is actually positioning itself as the savior, rather than the culprit, in this mess!
• The Treasury Secretary is authorized to purchase up to $700 billion in mortgage-related assets at any one time. That means $700 billion is only the very beginning of what will hit us.
• Financial institutions are “designated as financial agents of the Government.” This is the New Deal to end all New Deals.
• Then there’s this: “Decisions by the Secretary pursuant to the authority of this Act are non-reviewable and committed to agency discretion, and may not be reviewed by any court of law or any administrative agency.” Translation: the Secretary can buy up whatever junk debt he wants to, burden the American people with it, and be subject to no one in the process.
There goes your country.
Even some so-called free-market economists are calling all this “sadly necessary.” Sad, yes. Necessary? Don’t make me laugh.
Our one-party system is complicit in yet another crime against the American people. The two major party candidates for president themselves initially indicated their strong support for bailouts of this kind - another example of the big choice we’re supposedly presented with this November: yes or yes. Now, with a backlash brewing, they’re not quite sure what their views are. A sad display, really.
Although the present bailout package is almost certainly not the end of the political atrocities we’ll witness in connection with the crisis, time is short. Congress may vote as soon as tomorrow. With a Rasmussen poll finding support for the bailout at an anemic seven percent, some members of Congress are afraid to vote for it. Call them! Let them hear from you! Tell them you will never vote for anyone who supports this atrocity.
The issue boils down to this: do we care about freedom? Do we care about responsibility and accountability? Do we care that our government and media have been bought and paid for? Do we care that average Americans are about to be looted in order to subsidize the fattest of cats on Wall Street and in government? Do we care?
When the chips are down, will we stand up and fight, even if it means standing up against every stripe of fashionable opinion in politics and the media?
Times like these have a way of telling us what kind of a people we are, and what kind of country we shall be.
In liberty,
Ron Paul

Saturday, September 20, 2008

The LSD Party

What is the LSD Party? It's 'liberal socialist democrats'.

Friday, September 19, 2008

United Nations - Back door approach to taking away your guns


The government knows it cannot get enough support to take away all the guns from honest American citizens so it approaches the problem another way. By blending our laws with the U. N. it seeks to have another do their dirty work. Complete control of the population can only be achieved by a defenseless society. The U. N. in order to achieve a one world government under the pretense of peace and safety for everyone seeks to disarm the world, but you will notice a handgun statue in front of their office. Not an automatic weapon or machine gun of the military, just a pistol like what most citizens have. That's why the founding fathers gave the citizens the right to bear arms. It was to protect freedom-loving people from a evil government. Criminals are not punished if they use a weapon in commission of a crime, deliberately so in order to sway the public opinion against citizens having guns. A United States governed by the United Nations will be the final nail in the coffin of freedom in America.

Wednesday, September 10, 2008

Remembering 911

I guess it is fitting that on the 7th anniversary of the attack on America that I make the following comments. First there was Pearl Harbor, but what I consider much worse, the attack on 911. It seems that in America it's remember Pearl Harbor but forget 911. This said I will now say that the direction America has taken since 2001 has been more deadly than Pearl Harbor and 911 combined. Our biggest enemy has been the U. S. Government. George Bush is by far the worst President the U. S. has ever elected. Elected by conservatives to lead this country back to a sane, moral God fearing country he has been a complete failure. Our external enemies do not compare with the internal enemies that have infiltrated every segment of America. Truly a nation that will self destruct. Our congress is a joke. Our Supreme court a joke. Our laws a mockery of what is right and just. The Constitution is meaningless to our government. The ACLU and other Socialist groups and persons have done to America what aircraft carriers and passenger jets could not. Our news media spews forth constant deceit and lies. Our TV shows an open sewer system. Our society and schools have been corrupted beyond any normal persons thinking or reasoning. The hatred for America and Christianity by the left wing extremist and politicians knows no bounds. Our Children have been abused and brainwashed as much as any Palestinian child or those of islam. Is there any hope that either party running for President this year will make a difference. I'd give that a 10% chance of that happening maybe on the Republican side only because of Sarah Palin.

Wednesday, September 3, 2008

Foreign Policy experience


Last night on the Savage Nation, Michael went on a rampage about how Sarah Palin did not have any foreign policy experience. He said it would be much better if McCain had chosen Romney or some Senior Republican Senator with years of foreign policy experience. I did not know that people in today's elections were looking for a candidate strong in foreign policies. Have you ever seen a Senator that was good in foreign policy. None of them would even make a good banker. The only thing they are good at is spend, spend, spend. The last time we had anyone with good foreign policy experience was General Patton and General MacArthur. I will mention JFK. He did alright under difficult conditions. If JFK were alive today, he would be what we now call a Conservative.

Tuesday, September 2, 2008

Evolution is now official

Just like Global Warming, scientist now have indisputable proof of Evolution. How can you not believe? Just look at the photographic evidence.