Michael Savage

If you want to know the truth about what's going on in America, then Michael Savage is the one you need to listen to. But just like in the election, anyone who speaks the truth is demonized by the media. You can hear him on streaming audio on your computer starting at 6 PM eastern time on 910 am KNEW Talk Radio broadcasting from San Francisco.

John 14:6

Joseph farah
Obama: Never a Christian
Posted: October 23, 20081:00 am Eastern© 2008
In making his endorsement of Barack Obama, former Secretary of State Colin Powell made a religious assertion that cannot stand unchallenged.
Here's what he said: "I'm also troubled by, not what Senator [John] McCain says, but what members of the party say. And it is permitted to be said such things as, 'Well, you know that Mr. Obama is a Muslim.' Well, the correct answer is, he is not a Muslim; he's a Christian. He's always been a Christian."
I would state it a little bit differently.
Obama is not a Christian and never has been.
The most extensive comments ever offered by Obama about his faith came in a 2004 Chicago Sun-Times interview I first wrote about last May.
Asked what he believes, Obama said: "I am a Christian. I'm rooted in the Christian tradition. I believe that there are many paths to the same place, and that is a belief that there is a higher power, a belief that we are connected as a people. That there are values that transcend race or culture, that move us forward, and there's an obligation for all of us individually as well as collectively to take responsibility to make those values lived."
Many paths to the same place?
This is the antithesis of what Jesus reveals in Scripture, for example, in John 14:6: "Jesus saith unto him, I am the way, the truth, and the life: no man cometh unto the Father, but by me."
Obama also says in the interview he doesn't know if he is going to heaven, nor does he believe the alternative is hell.
That's pretty remarkable for someone professing to be a Christian. While I know, because Scripture tells us so, there will be many turned away from the narrow gate that leads to eternal life on Judgment Day, it's unusual for someone claiming to be a believer to be uncertain about his eternal fate. It suggests a high degree of spiritual confusion.
Obama also reveals in this interview at least an equal amount of constitutional illiteracy.
"Alongside my own deep personal faith, I am a follower, as well, of our civic religion," he says. "I am a big believer in the separation of church and state. I am a big believer in our constitutional structure. I mean, I'm a law professor at the University of Chicago teaching constitutional law. I am a great admirer of our founding charter and its resolve to prevent theocracies from forming and its resolve to prevent disruptive strains of fundamentalism from taking root in this country. I think there is an enormous danger on the part of public figures to rationalize or justify their actions by claiming God's mandate. I don't think it's healthy for public figures to wear religion on their sleeve as a means to insulate themselves from criticism, or dialogue with people who disagree with them."
Of course, nowhere in the Constitution will you find the phrase "separation of church and state" – not the U.S. Constitution, anyway. You will find it in the old Soviet Union constitution. The closest the U.S. Constitution comes to this subject matter is the First Amendment's restrictions on Congress against passing laws abridging the free exercise of religion and against establishing a state church.
Yet, this "constitutional scholar" evidently sees the First Amendment as a license to "prevent the disruptive strains of fundamentalism from taking root in this country."
While boasting a "personal relationship with Jesus Christ," in the same breath he says, "I think there is an enormous danger on the part of public figures to rationalize or justify their actions by claiming God's mandate. I don't think it's healthy for public figures to wear religion on their sleeve as a means to insulate themselves from criticism, or dialogue with people who disagree with them."
Obama says he prays regularly. But look how he describes that process: "It's not formal, me getting on my knees. I think I have an ongoing conversation with God. ... I'm constantly asking myself questions about what I'm doing, why I am doing it. The biggest challenge, I think, is always maintaining your moral compass."
So whom is he talking to in these conversations? He's talking to himself! He's talking to his under-developed conscience – the one that told him it was the right thing to do to prevent doctors and nurses from offering life-saving support to babies born alive after botched abortions. Am I surprised by any of this?
Of course not.
I've been listening to Barack Obama and watching him now throughout this presidential campaign.
. I think I have a good sense of who he is – and what his fruits are.
We are all shaped by our most basic beliefs about who we are and why we're here and who God is. Everyone has a worldview based on those precepts.
Obama's twisted prescription for policy change could only come from a worldview sowed by spiritual confusion and lack of discernment.
This interview, and others he has done since, revealed Obama, who calls himself a Christian, has no concept of what it means to be a follower of Jesus.
He states that he has no idea of what will happen to him when he dies.
He suggests his eternal destination has something to do with being a "good father" to his children and transferring values he got from his atheist mother.
He says there are many paths to heaven.
In other words, he doesn't have a clue as to what it means to be a Christian. That, of course, is not surprising given the only church experience he has had in his life has come in that hate-filled, racist, neo-Marxist, liberation theology-based Trinity United Church of Christ. There "Christianity" is used to sell other religions – anti-Americanism, black victimization, socialism.
Here's the key to Christianity: Followers of Jesus accept His atoning, sacrificial death on the cross as full, unmerited payment for their sins and the sins of the world. They further believe they need to do their best to be obedient to His commandments.
Christians should have confidence that if they do those two things, they will have eternal life, because that's what God's Word reveals.
There is nothing else I can do to earn eternal life. It's not about good works. And it's certainly not about the evil works of selling socialism and slavery.
In other words, Powell is dead wrong about Obama. He may not be a practicing Muslim, but Obama is certainly no follower of Jesus.

Government and media control elections

Well, I voted today but I do not hold much faith in the system. Between no choice, electronic balloting; open to fraud and no paper trail, a media controlled election, rigged polls, ACORN, a government and politicians I have absolutely no trust in I've had it. Need I say more. Did I leave anything out? Like I said, I voted early in case the "O" doesn't win. That way I can avoid the riots and gunfire. After a lot of thought (five seconds) I decided to write in my choice. Got to take a stand somewhere, send a message I no longer believe in your electoral controlled two, I mean one party system. The democrats have gone to pure socialism and the republicans have taken the liberal slot. There is no conservative wing of the government. In the picture above there was one person in the group who's message never changed. Run the Government as it was laid out in the Constitution. Most of our problems stem from doing things against whats stated in the Constitution. I will no longer be a 'puppet on a string voter' controlled by government and media lies. It seems that so far, only 5% of the population has figured this out.

2 visions of what America should be

By Joseph Farah
'One nation under God, indivisible …'?
Posted: October 21, 20081:00 am Eastern© 2008
When in the Course of human events it becomes necessary for one people to dissolve the political bands which have connected them with another and to assume among the powers of the earth, the separate and equal station to which the Laws of Nature and of Nature's God entitle them, a decent respect to the opinions of mankind requires that they should declare the causes which impel them to the separation.
The Declaration of Independence
I've lived through some turbulent years of American history, but I have never seen our country more polarized, more divided, more ripe for – dare I say it? – breakup, dissolution, a secessionist movement.
I admit I'm unafraid of radical ideas – if those radical ideas are just, righteous, moral and godly.
I believe it's time for radical ideas – just as it was time in 1776.
Frankly, I don't see a way to unite a people as divided as Americans are today. We are trying to pretend we're one nation when we are really two.
One of those two nations clings to the promises and covenants of the past, the Bible, the Declaration of Independence, the Constitution, as the guiding principles. The other believes in and lives with no immutable standards.
It's not a Republican vs. Democrat split – as the current election illustrates. I know many Republicans would find themselves more comfortable in the country of no standards. I also suspect many Democrats would actually find themselves more at home in the nation of the Bible, Declaration and Constitution.
Isn't it time for separation? Is the breakup of the union really such a difficult thing to consider? When there are no new lands to discover, what choice do we have?
My vision of the world is one in perfect harmony with the Bible, the Declaration and the Constitution. But these standards have been run over, obscured, distorted, demolished, nullified, undone, vandalized. Since, historically, it was the Bible, the Declaration and the Constitution that held us together, what binds us today? Shouldn't those of us who upheld the commitment to those standards have the right, in fact, the duty, to separate ourselves from those who have gutted them?
America was founded as a sovereign, independent nation. The vandals want to yield sovereignty to global authorities and make America interdependent.
America was founded with a federal government that was to be constitutionally limited in scope. The vandals have already succeeded in obliterating the enumerated powers.
America was founded as a nation of self-governing free people and sovereign states with significant authority reserved to them. The vandals have placed America under the shackles of a central government to which the states and people are subordinate.
America was founded as a nation of people "endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness." The vandals deny the Creator, invent man-made rights and deny life and liberty are sacred values.
I could go on and on, but you get the idea.
Order Farah's prescription for radical renewal, "Taking America Back"
We already are two peoples with irreconcilable differences sharing one nation. It's time for an amicable divorce – with each people free to pursue their own way.
I don't know how to make this happen. But I think it's time to start talking about it – start working toward it. I don't want to live under the consequences of the actions of the vandals. I don't want my children to do that. There ought to be a choice. Maybe we can live side by side in peace as two nations, but we can't live freely as one people any longer.
The moral justification for secession was found in our Declaration of Independence. It says governments are created to protect our unalienable right to life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness. It also says, "Whenever a government becomes destructive of these ends, it is the right of the people to alter or abolish it."
I know it's radical. I know it's not a topic being discussed on the Sunday morning talk shows. I know it's not a subject of op-eds in the New York Times. But, the more I think about it, the more I agree it's the only political solution that makes sense for an America that has lost its sense of mission and the original intent of those who wrote the Declaration of Independence and the Constitution.
What choice do we have but to break the bands that tie us together? Actually, to be honest, those bands have already been broken – by those who have, over time, grabbed control of our lives in a thousand insidious ways over the last 200-plus years.
It's time to move this debate forward – front and center. It's time to begin asking the real questions. It's time to restore liberty to America.
There's only one way to recapture the greatness of America. That is to start over – with only those willing to play by the rules. Let those who don't believe in rules have their own country to destroy.

People portraying the real idiots

A SNL Skit, you could of fooled me. I'd say close to real life workings in Congress.

Aztec, Mayan and Inca Empires - What type of culture/religion did they have

Does it seem to you that the white race has always been condemned as the one who is blamed for the most evil treatment of other races; but I say to you that every nation and people have had a not so glorious past. At least we passed on human sacrifices and cannibalism.

Obama and Jesus

The media says Obama is a Christian. Vaguely, I think he makes this claim also, yet he seems to have a hard time matching his beliefs with the Holy Bible. He also doesn't seem to fully understand the meaning of Christianity. For that fact, neither did his Church he attended for 20 years.

Go Green

A 'Green America'. Turn freeways into green ways. Get America off oil. A bicycle and a wagon is all you need in life. Breathe that clean fresh air. No need for a National Health Care plan. No more couch potatoes. By bicycling and walking all Americans will be healthy.No more dependence on foreign oil. A balance budget. No need to drill and endanger the environment. A return to a more quieter, simpler life. No need for shrinks. A reduction in crime, no get away vehicles. Hey, I've convinced myself. What's there not to like.

Movie portrayal of real life

When I saw ScootersReport picture of Nancy Pelosi, I thought; "where have I seen this face before"? Then I remembered, Mars Attack! In real life she's been devastating to Congress also. You know how politicians love to be in the lime light.

NOTE

I'm always trying to make improvements to this blog, but sometimes I'm a little slow in doing this. I welcome comments and have found out that my comments section was some what restricting. I have now open up comments to all. Thank you for visiting this site.

LBJ vs God

IRS should enforce pastor's speech ban. A spokesman for President Bush responds to question about preachers talking politics.
Posted: September 30, 20088:00 pm Eastern© 2008 WorldNetDaily
The Internal Revenue Service should be, and is, enforcing a law banning pastors from talking politics from their pulpits, according to a spokesman for the White House.
Deputy Press Secretary Tony Fratto today told Les Kinsolving, WND's correspondent at the White House, that he hasn't talked with the president about a campaign event last Sunday at which ministers of the Gospel addressed the moral issues at hand in the 2008 election.
Kinsolving asked: "The AP also reports that 33 pastors in 22 states made specific endorsements of political candidates in challenging the IRS-Lyndon Johnson ruling about no political endorsements in churches. And my question: Does the president believe that America's clergy should be denied the freedom of speech to endorse political candidates?"
Fratto responded: "Those rules are set forth in IRS regulations, directed by statute. And the IRS is enforcing the law, and the president believes that the IRS should enforce the law. But on the specific question of these clergymen, I haven't had that conversation with the president."
Alliance Defense Fund video says more pastors today should emulate the political activism of John Witherspoon
The campaign was launched by the Alliance Defense Fund to challenge the 1954 amendment to the Internal Revenue Code that barred non-profit groups such as churches from participating in or intervening in any political campaign on behalf of any political candidate.
At the time the effort was announced, ADF Senior Legal Counsel Erik Stanley said, "Pastors have a right to speak about biblical values from the pulpit without fear of punishment. No one should be able to use the government to intimidate pastors into giving up their constitutional rights.
"The government can't demand that a church give up its right to tax-exempt status simply because the pastor exercises his First Amendment rights in the pulpit. Groups like Americans United intentionally trigger IRS investigations that will silence churches through fear, intimidation, and disinformation," he said.
The organization has posted a website video described the history of the rights of free speech, those who worked toward that goal and how the restriction came about.
"Prior to 1954, churches were free to evaluate the positions of political candidates on moral issues without fear of the Internal Revenue Service revoking their tax-exempt status," the ADF said. "That year, then-Senator Lyndon Johnson amended the tax code to add the threat of IRS action against churches if their pastors mentioned the positions of specific candidates from the pulpit. Citing that rule, groups like [Americans United] have repeatedly threatened to report churches to the IRS if they speak out on such issues."
Other tax-exempt organizations, the ADF said, don't have the same restrictions as churches, such as civic leagues; labor, agricultural, or horticultural associations; business leagues; chambers of commerce; real estate boards; boards of trade; professional football leagues; clubs organized for pleasure, recreation, and other nonprofit purposes; fraternal beneficiary societies; and cemeteries.
"The intimidation of churches by leftist groups using the IRS has grown to a point that ADF has no choice but to respond," Stanley said at the time. "The number of threats being reported to ADF is growing because of the aggressive campaign to unlawfully silence the church. IRS rules don't trump the Constitution, and the First Amendment certainly trumps the Johnson amendment."
According to the ADF, several dozen pastors participated in Sunday's campaign.
Kinsolving addressed the issue in his column for WND. which cited a message from Rev. John W. Yates II, clergyman for The Falls Church near Washington.
Yates referred to the "movement" afoot to have pastors "preach politics."
The law banning pastors from commenting "has always troubled me," he said.
"I'm skeptical about the government's authority to dictate to the church in this way," Yates said. "There is a cultural elitism in America that would like to keep religion privately comforting but publicly irrelevant! But if our biblical faith does not inform and shape our thinking on public policy and guide us in whom to vote for, we are simply failing in our responsibility as followers of Christ. We won't always agree with one another, but it is unthinkable that followers of Christ wouldn't evaluate candidates policies in light of the Word of God. I don't plan to break the law next Sunday. But I could envision a time arising when I would feel that I would be disobeying God not to speak to you about some political issue or election."

Replacing God with Government

Ask a LSD party person (liberal socialist democrat) what made America great and he or she will say Government. Ask a true conservative and he or she will say God thru our faith in Jesus Christ. Foreign non-Christians nations did not have a problem with America's belief in God in the past. But when a Nation loses it's moral compass, it loses the respect of others and the enemy senses weakness and moves in to destroy that Nation.

The whole story you won't hear from our politicians

Soviet-style collapse in America's future?
Posted: By Henry Lamb

The meltdown in the financial markets has caused the finger of blame to spin like a weather vane in a hurricane. The underlying cause of the debacle, however, has been largely ignored. Driven by "progressive" Democrats and Republicans, the cause is the relentless shift from a free market economy to a socialist economy.
Until the Roosevelt era, the responsibility and privilege of having a home was left solely to the individual. Few people realize that Fannie Mae (Federal National Mortgage Association) was created in 1938 by FDR, to provide a federal guarantee for home loans extended by local banks.
Freddie Mac (Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corporation) was created in 1970, during Nixon's reign. Both were designed to buy mortgages from local lenders as a way to insure an adequate supply of money for local lenders. These "secondary" mortgages were packaged into "bundles" of securities that were traded among an array of financial institutions.
During the 1960s, the United Nations produced the International Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Racial Discrimination. Article V(e)(iii) proclaimed that all people had a "right" to housing. Both the Kennedy and Johnson administrations supported the treaty, but it was not ratified until the Clinton administration, Nov. 20, 1994. No one noticed or connected the dots to the emerging socialist, communitarian concept called "sustainable development." Grass-roots organizations across the nation were deeply involved in preventing ratification of another U.N. treaty, the Convention on Biological Diversity, which was also under consideration at the time.
To meet its obligations under the U.N.'s Racial Discrimination Treaty, the Clinton administration instructed Fannie Mae to expand loans to low-income borrowers, according to Franklin D. Raines, Fannie Mae's chairman. Thus, the "sub-prime" market was born, and government guaranteed-loans were extended to millions of families who could not qualify for a mortgage in a free market economy, but easily qualified under the new socialist scheme.
In 2005, Republican senators saw the danger and tried to reform these institutions with the Federal Housing Enterprise Regulator Reform Act (S.190), but Democrats blocked the bill.
Both Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac were institutions that were neither purely socialist, nor purely free market – a blend that is best described as communitarian, in that they allowed private investors to buy and hold shares in the corporations, but were also guaranteed by the federal government. That is, until recently, when the federal government took over both institutions. Now, the federal government essentially owns all those properties – a result that is as socialist as had the government nationalized those properties by force.
AIG, the international insurance giant, and other Wall Street and international financial institutions bought the bundles of mortgage securities that Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac offered. Everybody involved made a ton of money, and housing for low-income families expanded exponentially – just as the Treaty on Racial Discrimination and the proponents of sustainable development had predicted. With all the new loans being made, the home building industry flourished, the real estate industry flourished, all industries related to housing flourished – until the market became saturated.
Home values stopped rising. Housing inventories began to rise. Home values began to decline. Foreclosures began to rise. Home building slowed, housing-related industries began to lay off workers. Energy prices began to rise. Paychecks fell short of family needs. Foreclosures skyrocketed. Suddenly, there was little or no value in the bundles of security Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac had packaged. Financial institutions found themselves in possession of massive "assets" that had no value. Creak, crumble, crash! The financial markets came tumbling down.
The piper must be paid. The question is whether to do it now – and let the chips fall where they may, or, to kick the can down the road and pay the piper later. The answer, of course, is to kick the can into the next generation, with another leap toward socialism. The bailout plan – whatever the particulars – is nothing short of a government takeover of the financial industry. The next president will have to sort it out and build the road toward future recovery or final disaster.
Barack Obama's incessant drumbeat about the failure of the economic policies of the last eight years is either gross ignorance or, more likely, political blame shifting. The cause of the current meltdown is clearly the Democrat's insistence upon giving federally guaranteed mortgages to people who could not afford them. Even now, Democrats insist, not on the minimum government involvement possible, but on adding all sorts of give-away ornaments on the bailout Christmas tree. Obama is also promising to take over the energy industry, the health industry, and to give tax credits and even refunds to some people with money he shamelessly takes from others. This is redistribution of wealth – pure socialism.
McCain may be only marginally better, but any deterrent to the Democrats' determined transformation of America to unabashed socialism should be welcomed. Despite the U.N.'s declaration to the contrary, no person has a "right" to housing. If Democrats prevail and continue their pursuit of the U.N'.s goal of universal socialism, America can expect to experience the same total collapse experienced by the Soviet Union.
Ultimately, the piper must be paid.

48% of Americans vote Democrat. 48% of Americans vote Republican. At least this is what we are told by our media. These figures have been pretty much the same for the last 45 years but the American people are told that our troubles are the fault of the other party. So as of 2008 only 4% of the American people have figured out that our two party government keeps Americans on a prescribed course to a New World U. N. controlled Socialist order. Globalism where the masses are controlled like sheep. People who owe their existence, life and well being to a government. As mention in previous post, a Fahrenheit 451 society.

Ron Paul knew this day was coming years ago but no one would listen.

Message from Ron Paul to the Nation:
Dear Friends,
Whenever a Great Bipartisan Consensus is announced, and a compliant media assures everyone that the wondrous actions of our wise leaders are being taken for our own good, you can know with absolute certainty that disaster is about to strike.
The events of the past week are no exception.
The bailout package that is about to be rammed down Congress’ throat is not just economically foolish. It is downright sinister. It makes a mockery of our Constitution, which our leaders should never again bother pretending is still in effect. It promises the American people a never-ending nightmare of ever-greater debt liabilities they will have to shoulder. Two weeks ago, financial analyst Jim Rogers said the bailout of Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac made America more communist than China! “This is welfare for the rich,” he said. “This is socialism for the rich. It’s bailing out the financiers, the banks, the Wall Streeters.”
That describes the current bailout package to a T. And we’re being told it’s unavoidable.
The claim that the market caused all this is so staggeringly foolish that only politicians and the media could pretend to believe it. But that has become the conventional wisdom, with the desired result that those responsible for the credit bubble and its predictable consequences - predictable, that is, to those who understand sound, Austrian economics - are being let off the hook. The Federal Reserve System is actually positioning itself as the savior, rather than the culprit, in this mess!
• The Treasury Secretary is authorized to purchase up to $700 billion in mortgage-related assets at any one time. That means $700 billion is only the very beginning of what will hit us.
• Financial institutions are “designated as financial agents of the Government.” This is the New Deal to end all New Deals.
• Then there’s this: “Decisions by the Secretary pursuant to the authority of this Act are non-reviewable and committed to agency discretion, and may not be reviewed by any court of law or any administrative agency.” Translation: the Secretary can buy up whatever junk debt he wants to, burden the American people with it, and be subject to no one in the process.
There goes your country.
Even some so-called free-market economists are calling all this “sadly necessary.” Sad, yes. Necessary? Don’t make me laugh.
Our one-party system is complicit in yet another crime against the American people. The two major party candidates for president themselves initially indicated their strong support for bailouts of this kind - another example of the big choice we’re supposedly presented with this November: yes or yes. Now, with a backlash brewing, they’re not quite sure what their views are. A sad display, really.
Although the present bailout package is almost certainly not the end of the political atrocities we’ll witness in connection with the crisis, time is short. Congress may vote as soon as tomorrow. With a Rasmussen poll finding support for the bailout at an anemic seven percent, some members of Congress are afraid to vote for it. Call them! Let them hear from you! Tell them you will never vote for anyone who supports this atrocity.
The issue boils down to this: do we care about freedom? Do we care about responsibility and accountability? Do we care that our government and media have been bought and paid for? Do we care that average Americans are about to be looted in order to subsidize the fattest of cats on Wall Street and in government? Do we care?
When the chips are down, will we stand up and fight, even if it means standing up against every stripe of fashionable opinion in politics and the media?
Times like these have a way of telling us what kind of a people we are, and what kind of country we shall be.
In liberty,
Ron Paul

The LSD Party

What is the LSD Party? It's 'liberal socialist democrats'.

United Nations - Back door approach to taking away your guns

The government knows it cannot get enough support to take away all the guns from honest American citizens so it approaches the problem another way. By blending our laws with the U. N. it seeks to have another do their dirty work. Complete control of the population can only be achieved by a defenseless society. The U. N. in order to achieve a one world government under the pretense of peace and safety for everyone seeks to disarm the world, but you will notice a handgun statue in front of their office. Not an automatic weapon or machine gun of the military, just a pistol like what most citizens have. That's why the founding fathers gave the citizens the right to bear arms. It was to protect freedom-loving people from a evil government. Criminals are not punished if they use a weapon in commission of a crime, deliberately so in order to sway the public opinion against citizens having guns. A United States governed by the United Nations will be the final nail in the coffin of freedom in America.

Remembering 911

I guess it is fitting that on the 7th anniversary of the attack on America that I make the following comments. First there was Pearl Harbor, but what I consider much worse, the attack on 911. It seems that in America it's remember Pearl Harbor but forget 911. This said I will now say that the direction America has taken since 2001 has been more deadly than Pearl Harbor and 911 combined. Our biggest enemy has been the U. S. Government. George Bush is by far the worst President the U. S. has ever elected. Elected by conservatives to lead this country back to a sane, moral God fearing country he has been a complete failure. Our external enemies do not compare with the internal enemies that have infiltrated every segment of America. Truly a nation that will self destruct. Our congress is a joke. Our Supreme court a joke. Our laws a mockery of what is right and just. The Constitution is meaningless to our government. The ACLU and other Socialist groups and persons have done to America what aircraft carriers and passenger jets could not. Our news media spews forth constant deceit and lies. Our TV shows an open sewer system. Our society and schools have been corrupted beyond any normal persons thinking or reasoning. The hatred for America and Christianity by the left wing extremist and politicians knows no bounds. Our Children have been abused and brainwashed as much as any Palestinian child or those of islam. Is there any hope that either party running for President this year will make a difference. I'd give that a 10% chance of that happening maybe on the Republican side only because of Sarah Palin.

Foreign Policy experience

Last night on the Savage Nation, Michael went on a rampage about how Sarah Palin did not have any foreign policy experience. He said it would be much better if McCain had chosen Romney or some Senior Republican Senator with years of foreign policy experience. I did not know that people in today's elections were looking for a candidate strong in foreign policies. Have you ever seen a Senator that was good in foreign policy. None of them would even make a good banker. The only thing they are good at is spend, spend, spend. The last time we had anyone with good foreign policy experience was General Patton and General MacArthur. I will mention JFK. He did alright under difficult conditions. If JFK were alive today, he would be what we now call a Conservative.

Evolution is now official

Just like Global Warming, scientist now have indisputable proof of Evolution. How can you not believe? Just look at the photographic evidence.

History of Israel

http://www.terrorismawareness.org/what-really-happened/

A must see video!

Ann Coulter, the early years

Ann Coulter has always loved guns even since she was old enough to walk.

Jordan is the home of the Palestinians

History no one wants to talk about.

America's past and now

A Nation without God declines or as Liberals says, Evolve.

Fahrenheit 451

Fahrenheit 451 is just around the corner. Hide your books, especially the Bible. Just under half of Americans believe the government should mandate that all radio and television stations offer equal amounts of "conservative" and "liberal" political commentary, according to a new Rasmussen poll.
Rasmussen noted Republicans have expressed alarm in recent months over congressional Democratic efforts to restore the so-called Fairness Doctrine. The law was abolished in 1987, during the Reagan administration, opening the door to development of a flourishing talk-radio market led by Rush Limbaugh.
But the poll found 47 percent believe the government should require stations to "balance" the political viewpoint expressed over the airwaves.
Rasmussen found, however, 71 percent say it is already possible for just about any political view to be heard in today's media. Some 20 percent did not agree.
The poll also touched on regulation of the Internet, revealing 31 percent believe websites should be forced to balance their commentary.
This week, Rasmussen noted, Robert McDowell, a Bush appointee to the Federal Communications Commission, suggested restoration of the Fairness Doctrine could lead to government regulation of content on the Internet.
Ramussen's new survey found Democrats are more supportive of government involvement in the airwaves than Republicans and unaffiliated voters. The poll showed 54 percent of Democrats in favor and just 26 percent opposed. Republicans and unaffiliated voters are fairly evenly divided.
Republican Rep. Mike Pence of Indiana has introduced the Broadcaster Freedom Act, arguing the lifting of the Fairness Doctrine has "opened the public airwaves to free and vigorous discussion of controversial issues by individuals of all political stripes."
"Bringing back the Fairness Doctrine would amount to government control over political views expressed on the public airwaves," Pence said. "It is a dangerous proposal to suggest the government should be in the business of rationing free speech," he said.
Pence, a former broadcaster, said his Broadcasters Freedom Act would ensure that "true freedom and fairness will remain on our radio airwaves."

The Socialist Democrats Anti-God Government already controls the Press, Television, Supreme Court, Lawyers and Judges, now they are after the last source of freedom of speech, Religious broadcasting and Truth; that is Talk Radio and the Internet. On the Internet they are not worried about Porn or Homosexuality, just theses pesky Christians and their conservative views.

Send in the troops

When Obama heard that Russia had invaded Georgia, he called on President Bush to send troops to Atlanta and Savannah. President Bush said "you must be the stupidest person in the world! You know we can't afford to pull our troops out of Iraq and Afghan. We'll have to call on the United nations to send in a peace keeping force."