Take back America

Take back America
Take back America

None dare call it treason

None dare call it treason

Sunday, April 6, 2008

A real Hollywood Legend




Charlton Heston
AKA John Charlton Carter
Born: 4-Oct-1924 Birthplace: Evanston, IL Died: 5-Apr-2008 Location of death: Beverly Hills, CA Cause of death: Natural Causes
Gender: Male Religion: Protestant Race or Ethnicity: White Occupation: Actor Party Affiliation: Republican
Nationality: United States
Military service: US Army Air Corps (WWII, Sgt.)
Charlton Heston's parents were divorced when he was ten, and he lived with his mother and, later, stepfather. He studied drama at Northwestern University, where he first stepped before the camera at age 16 in a student-filmed silent production of the Henrik Ibsen play, Peer Gynt.
As an actor, Heston is most famous for larger-than-life roles in a series of epics,including, The Ten Commandments (1956), Ben-Hur (1959), which won him an Oscar, El Cid (1961), and the underrated Khartoum (1966). And then there's Planet of the Apes (1968), Soylent Green (1973), the disaster flicks Airport (1974) and Earthquake (1975), and TV's The Colbys (1985-87), a lame spin-off of Dynasty.
Off screen, Heston was active in the civil rights movement, and marched on Washington DC with Martin Luther King in 1963. Later in life he served as president of the National Rifle Association from 1998 to 2002. As NRA chief, Heston once held a 1776-era musket and uttered his most famous line: "I have only five words for you: From my cold, dead hands."
Father: Russell Whitford Carter Mother: Lilla Charlton Carter Father: Chester Heston (stepfather) Wife: Lydia Marie Clarke (m. 17-Mar-1944)Son: Fraser Clarke Heston (screenwriter and actor, b. 12-Feb-1955) Daughter: Holly Ann Heston (adopted, b. 1961)
High School: New Trier High School, Winnetka, IL (1941) University: Northwestern University
National Rifle Association President (1998-2003) Screen Actors Guild President (1966-71) Oscar for Best Actor 1960 for Ben-Hur Kennedy Center Honor 1997 Presidential Medal of Freedom 23-Jul-2003 Hollywood Walk of Fame 1620 Vine St. Accuracy in Media National Advisory Board Kennedy Center Trustee Emeritus Nicaraguan Freedom Fund Board of Directors US English Advisory Board Hip Replacement Surgery Risk Factors: Alzheimer's, Prostate Cancer

Saturday, April 5, 2008

Like-Minded People


Doesn't this remind you of how a Liberal thinks.

Tuesday, April 1, 2008

A real Border Fence




Israeli Government knows how to secure their borders. The U. S. could learn a lot from them, but what does G. W. Bush say to the Israeli Prime Minister? "Mr. Olert, take down this wall." Whats this, a Reagan wanna be. Does he know who our real friends are? Even Condoleezza Rice is killing Jews by pressuring them to remove roadblocks they put up trying to stop suicide bombers.

Monday, March 31, 2008

Who my write-in vote will be


Among conservative leaders only Ann Coulter, and now Alan Keys, refuses to fall into lockstep with the Republican Party. They both have disavowed John McCain's candidacy, and rightfully so. His nomination is proof the Republican Party will continue to leave conservatives on the edges of the Party tent, just far enough out to get a little wet when it rains. Somehow, many conservatives still believe they have a home among the very people who are forcing them into the rain.
That's why true conservatives like Ann Coulter are so vital at this time in American history. She is like a little voice whispering in the ear of conservatives everywhere, reminding them it's time to be a conservative first and a Republican second.
Unless the conservative Republican's stand up to take the party back we will be stuck with the failed policies phony conservatives who spend money like liberals, increase the government bureaucracy and leave true conservatives out in the cold.
It's time for conservatives to realize that a McCain presidency is not that far removed from a Hillary Clinton presidency and different from Barack Obama only on the war on terror. That is enough to make McCain a marginally better choice that Obama, although, when elected, Obama will fail to bring troops home as quickly has he promised. Even with his limited experience, he can see that pulling the troops out now will be snatching defeat from the jaws of victory.
One of the great pro-gun icons of our times, John Lott Jr. points out another flaw in McCain's conservative pedigree. Not only did McCain agree to another compromise with a Democrat, he personally introduced a provision banning private sales at gun shows. Although he sold it to the American public as a reasonable safety provision, he failed to mention that his bill would give the federal government total control over licensing gun shows, including the ability to deny such a license without giving cause. McCain's proposed legislation would also severely punish gun show promoters if any attendee broke the law at the event.
Such draconian gun laws are more commonly pushed by noted gun grabbers Sens. Charles Schumer, D-N.Y., and Diane Feinstein, D-Calif., not the presumptive Republican presidential nominee.
There is one final issue that McCain has tried in his bid to convince conservatives that he is still their candidate – judicial nominations. McCain was exposed, however, by his compromise over Bush's conservative nominees as someone who doesn't have the stomach to fight in the Senate for conservative judges. In this case, past performance is most likely a perfect indictor of future performance.
For many conservatives, it's also the final act of treason that forced them to make the difficult, but integrity laden choice, to turn their backs on McCain and the Republicans.
Coulter, alone among conservative commentators, has stayed true to the conservative principles brought to the political forefront by Ronald Reagan, and she alone stands on her values, not as a Republican political partisan, but as a conservative. That leaves only one option for conservatives who want to make a statement to the Republican Party – a write in campaign for Ann Coulter in the 2008 presidential election.
To do otherwise is to betray the conservative ideology, cave to those more concerned with power than principle and further the death of the soul of the Republican Party.

Friday, March 28, 2008

Fitna


http://www.liveleak.com/view?i=7d9_1206624103 Dutch Film maker exposes Islam. Now I've finally figured out what the love relationship is between the Left and Islam. You know what that is. "Tell the truth about us and we will kill you." Wouldn't the Liberals love to have that kind of power.

Sunday, March 23, 2008

Racism, America's biggest money making game



Patrick J. Buchanan
Posted: 03/21/2008

How would he pull it off? I wondered. How would Barack explain to his press groupies why he sat silent in a pew for 20 years as the Rev. Jeremiah Wright delivered racist rants against white America for our maligning of Fidel and Gadhafi, and inventing AIDS to infect and kill black people? How would he justify not walking out as Wright spewed his venom about "the U.S. of K.K.K. America," and howled, "God damn America!"
My hunch was right. Barack would turn the tables. Yes, Barack agreed, Wright's statements were "controversial," and "divisive," and "racially charged," reflecting a "distorted view of America." But we must understand the man in full and the black experience out of which the Rev. Wright came: 350 years of slavery and segregation. Barack then listed black grievances and informed us what white America must do to close the racial divide and heal the country. The "white community," said Barack, must start "acknowledging that what ails the African-American community does not just exist in the minds of black people; that the legacy of discrimination -- and current incidents of discrimination, while less overt than in the past -- are real and must be addressed. Not just with words, but with deeds ... ." And what deeds must we perform to heal ourselves and our country? The "white community" must invest more money in black schools and communities, enforce civil rights laws, ensure fairness in the criminal justice system and provide this generation of blacks with "ladders of opportunity" that were "unavailable" to Barack's and the Rev. Wright's generations. What is wrong with Barack's prognosis and Barack's cure? Only this. It is the same old con, the same old shakedown that black hustlers have been running since the Kerner Commission blamed the riots in Harlem, Watts, Newark, Detroit and a hundred other cities on, as Nixon put it, "everybody but the rioters themselves." Was "white racism" really responsible for those black men looting auto dealerships and liquor stories, and burning down their own communities, as Otto Kerner said -- that liberal icon until the feds put him away for bribery. Barack says we need to have a conversation about race in America. Fair enough. But this time, it has to be a two-way conversation. White America needs to be heard from, not just lectured to. This time, the Silent Majority needs to have its convictions, grievances and demands heard. And among them are these: First, America has been the best country on earth for black folks. It was here that 600,000 black people, brought from Africa in slave ships, grew into a community of 40 million, were introduced to Christian salvation, and reached the greatest levels of freedom and prosperity blacks have ever known. Wright ought to go down on his knees and thank God he is an American. Second, no people anywhere has done more to lift up blacks than white Americans. Untold trillions have been spent since the '60s on welfare, food stamps, rent supplements, Section 8 housing, Pell grants, student loans, legal services, Medicaid, Earned Income Tax Credits and poverty programs designed to bring the African-American community into the mainstream. Governments, businesses and colleges have engaged in discrimination against white folks -- with affirmative action, contract set-asides and quotas -- to advance black applicants over white applicants. Churches, foundations, civic groups, schools and individuals all over America have donated time and money to support soup kitchens, adult education, day care, retirement and nursing homes for blacks. We hear the grievances. Where is the gratitude? Barack talks about new "ladders of opportunity" for blacks. Let him go to Altoona and Johnstown, and ask the white kids in Catholic schools how many were visited lately by Ivy League recruiters handing out scholarships for "deserving" white kids. Is white America really responsible for the fact that the crime and incarceration rates for African-Americans are seven times those of white America? Is it really white America's fault that illegitimacy in the African-American community has hit 70 percent and the black dropout rate from high schools in some cities has reached 50 percent? Is that the fault of white America or, first and foremost, a failure of the black community itself? As for racism, its ugliest manifestation is in interracial crime, and especially interracial crimes of violence. Is Barack Obama aware that while white criminals choose black victims 3 percent of the time, black criminals choose white victims 45 percent of the time? Is Barack aware that black-on-white rapes are 100 times more common than the reverse, that black-on-white robberies were 139 times as common in the first three years of this decade as the reverse? We have all heard ad nauseam from the Rev. Al about Tawana Brawley, the Duke rape case and Jena. And all turned out to be hoaxes. But about the epidemic of black assaults on whites that are real, we hear nothing. Sorry, Barack, some of us have heard it all before, about 40 years and 40 trillion tax dollars ago.

If Black Americans had voted Republician



1865-1965 If you really researched history you would see that Racism and the KKK were primarily tools of the Democrat party. A party that controlled the South for a hundred years after the Civil war. All progress Blacks made were by conservatives. It's only that the liberal propaganda machine has lied and distorted the facts over the years that has deceived so many people. Abraham Lincoln was a Republican. The Cross and the Confederate Flag had no connection with the KKK. The KKK was formed after the Civil War by democrats who hated Lincoln for freeing the blacks. These symbols were hijacked by the KKK. You must remember, lies and deceit are the liberals greatest weapon. One can only wonder how much better the issue of Race relations would be today. If you have read my blogs you know I do not write this in support of today's Republican party. I support neither party today because now Christianity is under attack and even the Republicans have contributed to this attack. Supporting article. http://newsblaze.com/story/20080118113555nnnn.nb/topstory.html

Saturday, March 22, 2008

He Is Risen



The Day that changed the World forever.

Wednesday, March 19, 2008

"God Bless America, But Don't You Dare Tell Us To Repent!"

On my sites I've never put up "God Bless America" the reason being is, first must come Repentance. Written below is an excerpt from "In Plain Site". More correctly we should say "Pray for America".
But it is right here that the new American religiosity clamps its hands over its ears and refuses to hear. America wants God’s blessing. America wants God to protect us from more horrific visions of airliners flying purposefully, relentlessly into our national monuments. We want God to be near us as we board our aircraft. We want Him to protect us from the horror of thinking about what it was like when the towers collapsed. We want Him to guide our military and allow us to flex our muscle and launch our missiles with impunity. We want a blessing God, a caring God, who simply panders to our wants and whims. This is the “God” of the new American religiosity.
But what America does not want is a God who is holy, who is just, and who has revealed His will concerning how we, His creatures, are to live. America is a land soaked in blood. We glory in violence. We are so selfish, so bound in our avarice, fornication, and sexual lust, that we murder our own offspring in the womb (or at birth as in partial-birth infanticide). Our hands are covered in blood, and yet we think lighting a candle and lifting them up while mumbling “God Bless America” is going to bring God’s favor? Listen to the words of God to another nation that likewise was “religious” but refused to hear the word of repentance:
“So when you spread out your hands in prayer, I will hide My eyes from you; Yes, even though you multiply prayers, I will not listen. Your hands are covered with blood.” (Isaiah 1:15).
Is America so arrogant, so utterly self-absorbed, so diseased by religious liberalism and philosophical subjectivism, that she thinks she can ignore all of history itself and demand from God blessings when she refuses to repent of her evils?

Tuesday, March 18, 2008

Protect yourself, because the Government won't


Well, here we go again. Just ban guns and all will be well. Laws were made for honest people to let them know what the limits of their actions could be in a society. I have never seen a criminal obey laws. A 45 year "War on Drugs" which cost billions of dollars hasn't put a dent in the drug problem. There are no shortage of drugs anywhere. I've never heard someone say, don't go to that town, there's no drugs there. If you ban guns, you are a fool if you think a criminal won't be able to get a gun. How insane can one get. I'll tell you what, the day politicians give up the security details, I'll give up my gun. But just like everything they do, whatever law a politician passes, they exempt themselves from having to go by that law.

Tuesday, March 11, 2008

Shuttle Launch


A Shuttle Launch as seen from above, truly amazing.

Saturday, March 8, 2008

This day in History



President Lincoln had to look to the west to find qualified leadership for the Union Army. From Ohio he found both Grant and Sherman. Grant was Commission On March 9, 1864, President Abraham Lincoln officially commissioned Ulysses S. Grant the first Lieutenant General in the U.S. Army since George Washington. In the face of repeated defeats on the eastern front of the war, Grant had been a consistent source of good news -- and good generalship -- in the West. "I can't spare this man," Lincoln said, "he fights."

Thursday, March 6, 2008

2002 SS Camaro


This is the sharpest Camaro I've ever seen. The 35th and final edition.

Monday, March 3, 2008

The direction America has taken


18 For the wrath of God is revealed from heaven against all ungodliness and unrighteousness of men who suppress the truth in unrighteousness, 19 because that which is known about God is evident within them; for God made it evident to them. 20 For since the creation of the world His invisible attributes, His eternal power and divine nature, have been clearly seen, being understood through what has been made, so that they are without excuse. 21 For even though they knew God, they did not honor Him as God or give thanks, but they became futile in their speculations, and their foolish heart was darkened. 22 Professing to be wise, they became fools, 23 and exchanged the glory of the incorruptible God for an image in the form of corruptible man and of birds and four-footed animals and crawling creatures. 24 Therefore God gave them over in the lusts of their hearts to impurity, so that their bodies would be dishonored among them. 25 For they exchanged the truth of God for a lie, and worshiped and served the creature rather than the Creator, who is blessed forever. Amen. 26 For this reason God gave them over to degrading passions; for their women exchanged the natural function for that which is unnatural, 27 and in the same way also the men abandoned the natural function of the woman and burned in their desire toward one another, men with men committing indecent acts and receiving in their own persons the due penalty of their error. 28 And just as they did not see fit to acknowledge God any longer, God gave them over to a depraved mind, to do those things which are not proper, 29 being filled with all unrighteousness, wickedness, greed, evil; full of envy, murder, strife, deceit, malice; they are gossips, 30 slanderers, haters of God, insolent, arrogant, boastful, inventors of evil, disobedient to parents, 31 without understanding, untrustworthy, unloving, unmerciful; 32 and although they know the ordinance of God, that those who practice such things are worthy of death, they not only do the same, but also give hearty approval to those who practice them. This is from Romans, chapter 1. Fits right into todays headlines.

Friday, February 29, 2008

America has lost it's moral compass


Ten rules to live by. Americans use to teach these rules to their children. They were a part of what made America great. Now the powers to be are doing everything they can to completely remove any mention of the Ten Commandments. Just common sense would tell you this would be a great tool to live by. But I guess people are more happy with the rapes, murders and shootings we see in the news today. They don't want to pollute their children minds with good moral teaching and doing what is right.

Wednesday, February 27, 2008

TV Shows - what message does it teach our Children


    When I was growing up in the 50's, early 60's in eastern N. C. we were not exposed to the constant sex, violence, lies and hatred that children are seeing today 24-7. Even on TV the shows had good clean programs. I'm glad we didn't have video games where you go around killing everyone for hours at a time. Today's newspaper headlines are filled with violence committed by people. We are reaping the violence we've sown. Today, TV has no positive impact on our Children. Their message is always a negative trait.
Trait-Positive ----Trait-Negative
Attitudes
accepts authority, loyal, devoted ---rebellious
accepts what's given ---ignores, rejects what's given
affectionate--- distant, cold, aloof
caring ---uncaring, unfeeling, callous
cheerful ---cheerless, gloomy, sour, grumpy
considerate, thoughtful ---inconsiderate, thoughtless
cooperative ---uncooperative, unhelpful, combative
courageous ---cowering, fearful
courteous-- -rude, impolite
devoted-- -uncommitted, uncaring, hostile
does what is necessary, right ---does what is convenient
perseveres, endures ---relents, gives up
faith in life ---life can't be trusted
faith in oneself ---lack of faith in self
faith in others ---others can't be relied on
forgiving-- -unforgiving, resentful, spiteful
freedom given to others--- authoritarian, controlling
friendly ---unfriendly, distant, aloof, hostile
frugal, thrifty--- Wasteful, spendthrift
generous ---stingy, miserly, selfish
goodwill ---ill-will, malice, hatred
grateful ---ungrateful, unappreciative
hard-working--- lazy honest ---dishonest, deceiving, lying
humble ---arrogant, conceited, ego-centric
jealous not--- jealous, envious, covetous
kind--- unkind, uncaring, cruel, mean loving---hateful
mature ---immature
modest ---vain
open-minded, tolerant--- narrow, close, small-minded, intolerant
optimistic---pessimistic
respectful ---disrespectful, rude, impolite
responsibility, takes--- blames others
responsible ---unreliable, undependable
responsive--- unresponsive, unreceptive
self-disciplined ---undisciplined, unrestrained, indulgent
self-esteem, high self-esteem, ---confidence low
self-giving ---self-centered
sensitive--- Insensitive, indifferent
serious ---silly, trivial, petty
sincere ---insincere, dishonest
sympathetic ---unsympathetic, unfeeling
thoughtful towards others ---thoughtless, inconsiderate, mistrusting
unselfish ---selfish

Monday, February 25, 2008

Cat tastrophe


Reminds me of my cat.

Sunday, February 24, 2008

The end of America


February 23, 2008
The Materialist Faith of Communism, Socialism, and LiberalismBy Linda Kimball
For over eighty-five years, America has been incrementally conquered by the same madness-inducing demon of hatred and violence that earlier took over Russia, China, Germany, and Italy. Rabbi Aryeh Spiro concurs,
"There is a madness in today's liberal thinking. It insists on policies that tie our hands to defend ourselves while given free reign to the jihadists intent on killing us. It is dangerous because it is becoming the law, and thinking of the land in the western world. (Liberal Madness is Deadly (1/24/08)
This demon is embodied in "enlightened" Liberals and the West's transnational "elite," both of which are deeply infected by materialistic Communism (Cultural Marxism) and the delusion that the true enemy of America is always on the Right. Having rejected God and the religious heritage of our civilization, they embrace instead a new order of beliefs of which Communism and Socialism are logical expressions. A new world order is what they seek, but in order that it can emerge, the existing culture must be completely destroyed.
And what is Communism? Using the former Soviet Union as an example, Frank Meyers describes it as, "The state form taken by a materialist faith determined to rule the world." Communism or scientific materialism is "the final synthesis of all heretical tendencies that have pervaded Western civilization for many centuries." It is materialist scientism, of which,
"Communism is the culminating hubris of the Promethean man who reaches out for the world and means to remake creation. It is scientism gone political." (The Conservative Intellectual Movement, pp. 251-252)
We are All Materialists Now
"An age of science is necessarily an age of materialism," declared Hugh Elliot early last century, "Ours is a scientific age, and it may be said with truth that we are all materialists now." (Darwin Day in America, John G. West, xiv)
Materialist faith, or scientific materialism, has virtually displaced America's founding Judeo-Christian worldview with the result that materialism is now the operative assumption for much of our government, culture, politics, and law. Materialist operatives now control every public institution in the United States. According to the inner logic of materialist faith, "we the people" are nothing but socially-constructed atomized robots which can presumably be deconstructed and melted into an atomized mass. Toward both this goal and to raise up an army of street thugs who will destroy our culture, materialist change-agents use our education system to subvert and convert the minds of our youth. Should they succeed in thoroughly corrupting them and in turning their hearts to hate, this generation of children may become the next Khmer Rouge, who at Pol Pot's order murdered nearly two-million people, including their own families.

America is founded on the Judeo-Christian creation model. Materialist faith rises or falls on the assumptions of metaphysical materialism and evolution.
Materialism belongs to the family of Naturalism, which refers to the view that nature (or matter) is the Ultimate Substance of which the universe and all life are made, thus "all is one." C. S. Lewis describes naturalism as a box with its top sealed tightly closed in order to keep out God and the supernatural realm. The ancient Ionians, Babylonians, Egyptians, and Aztecs were, for example, naturalists. In this view there is but one realm (the material or natural) as opposed to Judeo-Christianity's creation model with its two interacting realms: natural and supernatural.
There are two basic kinds of Naturalism: materialism (i.e., Communism) and pantheism (i.e., Nazism and New Age Spiritual Communism). The two kinds differ chiefly about whether the First Cause or Absolute Substance is nonliving, non-intelligence bearing matter or an unknowing, unknowable, amoral mind. However, both kinds are united by their rejection of the transcendent, personal God and the supernatural realm and by their acceptance of some form of evolution, which serves as an impersonal, mechanical process of development.
Birth of Scientific Materialism: A Brief Historical Overview
As will be shown by the following overview, scientific materialism is not founded on empirical science, as has been its deceptive claim, but rather on metaphysics.
In the main, modern materialism originated in the metaphysics of the ancient Ionians and Stoics during the sixth century BC. However, it was the Atomists (Leucippus/Democritus, 460-357 BC; Epicurus, 342-270 BC; and Lucretius, 96-55 BC) who methodically developed materialism.
Forged in a furnace of narcissism, envy, and contempt, Atomism was from its inception an antihuman abomination which in later years, would attract those who enjoy the control and domination of others. Atomism set all things in ceaseless, purposeless motion by reducing everything---including man, his soul, and even his thoughts---to mindless atoms perpetually colliding with each other in a void. Man was reduced to a soulless, mindless machine that could only ‘see' a tree because the tree emitted atoms which entered machine-man's eyes and implanted themselves onto his brain. This view has changed very little:
"We are descended from robots, and composed of robots..." --Daniel C. Dennett, Kinds of Minds
Plato and Aristotle were the most forceful and compelling critics of Atomism. In Book X of Laws, Plato indicts the Atomists for reversing the natural order, which they did by placing dead matter before Nous (mind/soul), and for the reductionism that sets everything in motion and reduces man to a machine. Plato foresees only misery, social disintegration and ultimately, "the ruin of both states and families" should Atomism become the accepted view.
Though Christianity reared a mighty barrier against Atomism, it would be resurrected--- along with the hylozoism of the Ionians and Stoics---during the Renaissance by among others, pantheist Giordano Bruno and the heretic Paracelsus, an alchemist described by C.S. Lewis as a magician in his book, The Abolition of Man.
Hylozoism (Greek hyle=nature; zoe-life) is the doctrine according to which all of nature's bodies (i.e., sun, earth, moon, trees, man) possess life, mind, soul, and even divinity. By infusing Atomism with Ionian hylozoism, what might be called materialzoism was invented by Bruno, Paracelsus, and others. In short, dead matter was not just brought to life but deified.
The Franco-Germanic Enlightenment
With "God dead" and the source of man's humanity (mind/soul) expropriated by materialists and conferred upon "dead matter," a rush to discover the key that unlocks the mystery to life and mind was ignited which in later years unleashed unspeakable evil. For in believing that without a doubt, they now possessed the gnosis (secret knowledge) to not only design a utopia but create a New Man with a reprogrammed mind and conscience, Nazi and Soviet scientists performed sadistic experiments on living human beings. It was of these later scientific materialists that C.S. Lewis wrote his book, "The Abolition of Man." Even now, wrote Lewis, the process to "abolish Man goes on apace among Communists and Democrats (and) Fascists." The methods, said Lewis, may at first differ in brutality. But "enlightened" materialists from scientists to philosophers to academe and to political leaders mean, in the long run, "Just the same as the Nazis..." The West and America are to be destroyed and "mankind to be cut out in some fresh shape at the will" of scientific materialists who Lewis calls the Conditioners and Innovators. These people, noted Lewis, are no longer men, for they have stepped out into the void.
Among the horde of Prometheans who set out to discover the animating-power of machine-man was Giovanni Aldini, who performed macabre experiments on decapitated oxes, horses, lambs, and -- once he had overcome his repugnance, on humans. For his experiments, he procured the freshest specimens possible by placing himself "under the scaffold, near the axe of justice..." Believing that some type of electricity was the source of machine-mans animation, Aldini applied electricity to various parts of decapitated human heads. This produced "the most horrid grimaces (but the) action of the eyelids was exceedingly striking." Aldini rationalized his repugnant experiments by saying that only the "unenlightened part of mankind (will be) apt to entertain a prejudice..." (Darwin Day in America, p. 15)
Yet more power-crazed Prometheans emerged. Julien de la Mettrie (1709-51), Paul Henri Thiery, and Baron D'Holbach (1723-89) all agreed that the mind is the property of dead matter and man nothing but a machine. La Mettrie speculated that machine-mans rational life is entirely determined by physical causes that run the gamut from raw meat, to climate, blood circulation, and gender. Genetic inheritance, posits la Mettrie, causes machine-man to commit crime. This view casts parents into the role of "first cause" and would later manifest itself in the belief that State ‘experts,' or Hillary's "village" experts should have control of children. (ibid, pp. 16-18)
Pierre Simon Laplace (1749-1827) viewed scientific materialism as not only the pursuit of God-like omniscience but of the Holy Grail itself---power to create a New Man. If an intelligence could grasp "at a given instant...all the forces by which nature is animated" proclaimed Laplace, it could devise a mathematical formula that would predict everything that would ever happen, and "nothing would be uncertain, and the future, like the past, would be open to its eyes." Scientists should reduce everything in the universe to mechanical laws that could be expressed in terms of mathematics, advised Laplace, for the promise of such knowledge was incredible power...even over life and mind itself. (ibid, p. 20)
Herbert Spencer, Fechner, Lotze, Wundt, and pantheist Ernst Haeckel, inventer of the scientism dictum---ontogeny recapitulates phylogeny---all agreed that life and mind are properties of dead matter. Haeckel moreover imagined ether to be the primitive life-making substance which, as was the case with the primitive fire of the Stoics, changed one part of itself into inert mass while the other part became the active principle, spirit. Today, many scientists routinely resort to Haeckel's postulate without ever inquiring into its pantheist implications.
Haeckel would later write, "Pantheism teaches that God and the world are one...pantheism is...an advanced conception of nature (and) a polite form of atheism." The truth of pantheism, confessed Haeckel, "lies in its destruction of the dualist antithesis of God..." The godless world system being constructed, said Haeckel, "substantially agrees with the monism or pantheism of the modern scientist." (Monism, Ernst Haeckel, www.pantheist.net/)
During the century to follow, Charles Darwin (1809-82) would help spread materialism to the masses. As Stephen Jay Gould argues, "Darwin applied a consistent philosophy of materialism to his interpretation of nature, "and "the ground of all existence; mind, spirit, and God (are reduced to) neural complexity." (ibid, p. 41)
According to Darwin, natural selection and the laws of heredity acting on matter produced mind, morality, and civilization. By describing how deified natural mechanisms caused the complexity of life to emerge from deified matter, Darwin helped transform materialism from a fantastically bizarre tale told by power-mad Prometheans on the fringe of society to a hallowed scientism principle enshrined and worshipped by modern scientism and ‘enlightened' Westerners.
It was during this time that Social Darwinism, Progressivism, Socialism, Communism (Cultural Marxism, New Left), Nazism, and Secular Humanism were developed out of metaphysical materialism. Classical Liberalism on the other hand, was subverted and corrupted by the materialist faith into what is now known as modern Liberalism. Of these, Communism (Marx and Engel's dialectical materialism), is considered to be the most highly developed philosophy of materialism. It rests on three fundamental metaphysical presuppositions:
1. Deified Matter: The Ultimate Substance which, though non-living, non-intelligent, and non-conscious, nevertheless somehow possesses the emergent properties of life, mind, consciousness, and soul.
2. Evolution: Since Marxist dialectic requires a theory with clashes (thesis and antithesis) and leaps (synthesis), Marxists have all but abandoned Darwinism and instead have embraced punctuated equilibrium. "Many people confound dialectic with the theory of evolution," noted G. Plekhanov. "Dialectic is, in fact, a theory of evolution. But it differs profoundly from the vulgar (Darwinian) theory of evolution." (Fundamental Problems of Marxism, 1929, p. 145)
3. Spontaneous Generation: An offshoot of specifically Darwinian thought accepted unreservedly by Marxists as their dialectic requires a strictly materialist explanation for the origin of life from dead matter. In the words of M.A. Leonov: "Marxist philosophical materialism remains beyond all doubt that at some time or other in the remote past, life must have arisen from non-living matter." (Outline of Dialectical Materialism, 1948, p. 494)
In a modified version of the Stoic conception of the earth as a living organism possessed of its own soul, neo-pantheist dialectical materialism declares that earth is "one entire organism...its organs the various races and nations of men." Not only is the earth alive and evolving upward on evolution's magical escalator, but so too are history and society, for they also are living entities in a continuous state of motion. And man? In a modified conception of Atomism's extremely dehumanizing view of man, dialectical materialism states that man is nothing but "a colonial aggregation of cells," and to "consider him an individual would be an error." Man---the aggregate of cells--- is nothing but an extension of society, history, and earth. (Russian Textbook on Psychopolitics, Chapter II: The Constitution of Man as a Political Organism)
Death of America?
Modern materialist states began by rejecting God and denying objective standards of right and wrong. They threw out sanctity of life and demonically reduced man to matter in motion. The end case, in every instance, was to place absolute power over "atomized masses" into the hands of psychopaths and autocratic states to be wielded without restraint or mercy.
Of all religions, the materialist faith has been by far the bloodiest. In his book, Death by Government, R.J. Rummel comprehensively details the roughly 170 million people murdered by materialist governments during the 20th century. From 1917 to its collapse in 1991, the Soviet Union liquidated about 62 million. During Mao Tse-tung's reign, 35,236,000 were murdered. Hitler's Nazi's killed 21 million. Even at its mildest, as is thus far the case here in America, there is a steady level of confiscation, corruption, fraud, and stifling of freedoms and free speech. For the first time ever, Americans are afraid of saying certain words. Parents fear disciplining their own children. More ominously, materialists in control of America (i.e., ACLU, activist judges) have rejected God and thrown out both sanctity of life and objective standards. "We the people" have been reduced to atomized beings. Totalitarianism and genocide loom just over our horizon.
As early as 1926, President Calvin Coolidge was aware of and deeply concerned by the insidious spread scientific materialism in America. As he knew, Americans are free only because of the Judeo-Christian foundation laid by the country's founders. In a speech he delivered in Philadelphia, July 5, 1926 to commemorate the 150th anniversary of the Declaration of Independence, Coolidge tried to call American's back to their Judeo-Christian heritage. He told Americans that the Declaration's principles of liberty arise from man's God-given inalienable rights. And these are found, said Coolidge, "in the texts, the sermons, and the writings of the early colonial clergy..." The clergy preached equality "because they believed in the fatherhood of God and the brotherhood of man." Sanctity of life, the right to self-defense, and all the rest of our individual liberties were justified "by the text that we are all created in the divine image, all partakers of the divine spirit." God's children therefore, have no "superiors;" there are no modern-day "divine rights kings" who possess "any right to rule...over them." Americans are free to choose their own leaders.
The Declaration, continued Coolidge, is "a great spiritual document." Its principles are not material but spiritual. "Equality, liberty, popular sovereignty, the rights of man---these are not elements we can see and touch. They are ideals (whose) source and roots (are) in religious convictions. They belong to the unseen world."
President Coolidge cautioned Americans that, "unless the faith of the Americans in these religious convictions is to endure, the principles of our Declaration will perish. We can not continue to enjoy the result if we abandon the cause."
Coolidge ended his speech with a stark warning, "We must not sink into a pagan materialism..." (Back Fired, William Federer, pp. 269-271)
Yet, believing they are "enlightened" and "scientific," maddened Liberals and Transnational "elites" are leading America over the Gadarene Cliff.
Linda Kimball is a member of the MoveOff organization and a New Media Alliance member.Page Printed from: http://www.americanthinker.com/2008/02/the_materialist_faith_of_commu.html at February 24, 2008 - 11:30:16 PM EST
_uacct = "UA-31527-12";
urchinTracker();

Wednesday, February 20, 2008

The downfall of America






Like the Roman Empire, how many bad Emperors (Presidents) can America have and still survive. Yeah, I know; should have added Nixon to the list.

Tuesday, February 19, 2008

Liberal: One who is not Christ led - does not bear witness to the truth


Galations 5:22-23 But the fruit of the Spirit is love, joy, peace, longsuffering, gentleness, goodness, faith, meekness, temperance: against such there is no law.


-------------------------------------------------------------------------------- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Top psychiatrist concludes liberals are clinically nuts!Makes case ideology is mental disorder
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------Posted: February 15, 20083:40 pm Eastern
© 2008 WorldNetDaily

WASHINGTON – Just when liberals thought it was safe to start identifying themselves as such, an acclaimed, veteran psychiatrist is making the case that the ideology motivating them is actually a mental disorder.
"Based on strikingly irrational beliefs and emotions, modern liberals relentlessly undermine the most important principles on which our freedoms were founded," says Dr. Lyle Rossiter, author of the new book, "The Liberal Mind: The Psychological Causes of Political Madness." "Like spoiled, angry children, they rebel against the normal responsibilities of adulthood and demand that a parental government meet their needs from cradle to grave."
While political activists on the other side of the spectrum have made similar observations, Rossiter boasts professional credentials and a life virtually free of activism and links to "the vast right-wing conspiracy."
For more than 35 years he has diagnosed and treated more than 1,500 patients as a board-certified clinical psychiatrist and examined more than 2,700 civil and criminal cases as a board-certified forensic psychiatrist. He received his medical and psychiatric training at the University of Chicago.
Rossiter says the kind of liberalism being displayed by the two major candidates for the Democratic Party presidential nomination can only be understood as a psychological disorder.
"A social scientist who understands human nature will not dismiss the vital roles of free choice, voluntary cooperation and moral integrity – as liberals do," he says. "A political leader who understands human nature will not ignore individual differences in talent, drive, personal appeal and work ethic, and then try to impose economic and social equality on the population – as liberals do. And a legislator who understands human nature will not create an environment of rules which over-regulates and over-taxes the nation's citizens, corrupts their character and reduces them to wards of the state – as liberals do."
Dr. Rossiter says the liberal agenda preys on weakness and feelings of inferiority in the population by:
creating and reinforcing perceptions of victimization; satisfying infantile claims to entitlement, indulgence and compensation;augmenting primitive feelings of envy;
rejecting the sovereignty of the individual, subordinating him to the will of the government."The roots of liberalism – and its associated madness – can be clearly identified by understanding how children develop from infancy to adulthood and how distorted development produces the irrational beliefs of the liberal mind," he says. "When the modern liberal mind whines about imaginary victims, rages against imaginary villains and seeks above all else to run the lives of persons competent to run their own lives, the neurosis of the liberal mind becomes painfully obvious."

Saturday, February 16, 2008

Ann Coulter says


Ann Coulter said; just like what Pontius Pilate said of Jesus, "I find no fault in this man".

Monday, February 11, 2008

Teaching kids hate and violence


Just as Al Qeada and the Palestinian terrorist train kids to hate and kill Americans and Jews, video game companies like PS2, Rockstar Games, Sony Entertainment and X-Box 360 are poluting our childrens minds with senseless killing and sex 24-7. If you expose yourself to evil all the time then evil will seem normal. Can you imagine standing before God on Judgement Day explaining your motives for making these games for kids and teens? Turn up the thermostat.

Friday, February 8, 2008

Michael Savage rejects the Truth







When Ann Coulter said "Christians were to witness to the World that Jesus Christ is the only way to Heaven", Savage said she was a fanatic. He made mute Christianity and that Jesus died for our sins. His listeners tried to call in to say that she was right but he told them that they were stupid to be so narrow minded and that any religion would get you to Heaven. Finally he stop taking their calls on the subject and continued to call Ann Coulter every name in the book.
Last thursday, when he talked about those who were running for president, he said all of them were socialist; not one conservative among them. Not once on his shows has he ever mention Ron Paul. He's ignored even mentioning his name just like the mainstream media does. I called his show and to my surprise I was able to get thru. I told the screener I wanted to tell him that Ron Paul held the same conservative views that he did. The screener said "We've had too many calls about Ron Paul" and hung up on me. So once again he snubbed his listeners. I think his actions will drive away some of his listening base. He's closed his ears to the Truth.

Thursday, February 7, 2008

Ron Paul - One of a kind


About Ron Paul
Congressman Ron Paul is the leading advocate for freedom in our nation’s capital. As a member of the U.S. House of Representatives, Dr. Paul tirelessly works for limited constitutional government, low taxes, free markets, and a return to sound monetary policies. He is known among his congressional colleagues and his constituents for his consistent voting record. Dr. Paul never votes for legislation unless the proposed measure is expressly authorized by the Constitution.In the words of former Treasury Secretary William Simon, Dr. Paul is the “one exception to the Gang of 535” on Capitol Hill.
Ron Paul was born and raised in Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania. He graduated from Gettysburg College and the Duke University School of Medicine, before proudly serving as a flight surgeon in the U.S. Air Force during the 1960s. He and his wife Carol moved to Texas in 1968, where he began his medical practice in Brazoria County. As a specialist in obstetrics/gynecology, Dr. Paul has delivered more than 4,000 babies. He and Carol, who reside in Lake Jackson, Texas, are the proud parents of five children and have 17 grandchildren.
While serving in Congress during the late 1970s and early 1980s, Dr. Paul’s limited-government ideals were not popular in Washington. In 1976, he was one of only four Republican congressmen to endorse Ronald Reagan for president.
During that time, Congressman Paul served on the House Banking committee, where he was a strong advocate for sound monetary policy and an outspoken critic of the Federal Reserve’s inflationary measures. He was an unwavering advocate of pro-life and pro-family values. Dr. Paul consistently voted to lower or abolish federal taxes, spending and regulation, and used his House seat to actively promote the return of government to its proper constitutional levels. In 1984, he voluntarily relinquished his House seat and returned to his medical practice.
Dr. Paul returned to Congress in 1997 to represent the 14th congressional district of Texas. He presently serves on the House Committee on Financial Services and the House Committee on Foreign Affairs. He continues to advocate a dramatic reduction in the size of the federal government and a return to constitutional principles.
Congressman Paul’s consistent voting record prompted one of his congressional colleagues to say, “Ron Paul personifies the Founding Fathers’ ideal of the citizen-statesman. He makes it clear that his principles will never be compromised, and they never are.” Another colleague observed, “There are few people in public life who, through thick and thin, rain or shine, stick to their principles. Ron Paul is one of those few.”

Brief Overview of Congressman Paul’s Record:
He has never voted to raise taxes.He has never voted for an unbalanced budget.He has never voted for a federal restriction on gun ownership.He has never voted to raise congressional pay.He has never taken a government-paid junket.He has never voted to increase the power of the executive branch.
He voted against the Patriot Act.He voted against regulating the Internet.He voted against the Iraq war.
He does not participate in the lucrative congressional pension program.He returns a portion of his annual congressional office budget to the U.S. treasury every year.
Congressman Paul introduces numerous pieces of substantive legislation each year, probably more than any single member of Congress.

Road to ruin



We have gone from a Republic to a Democracy and now a Idiotocracy. The Governments transition is complete. The people will believe anything the media and government tells them. The bigger the lie the more they'll believe it. After super tuesday; if the voting was not fixed, saw Ron Paul with only 5% of the nations votes. That leaves about 95% of the nation with a political IQ smaller than my waistband. It was once said "Ask not what your country can do for you but what you can do for your country". Now it's "What can my country do for me" because I'm a dumbass and don't know what to do unless someone tells me. I'll believe anything a politician tells me because they will take care of me. It's said, "The truth will set you free" but you reject the truth so we become a nation of slaves waiting for your handouts.